Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Carolina AT Cincinnati Vegas Odds


jamos14

Recommended Posts

It is absolutely NOT a prediction by Vegas as to who will win. The initial line is created as a prediction on how they believe the avg bettor will bet. Most people perceive the Bengals as the stronger team and Vegas expects higher bets on them. Therefore, they set the line to get money moving our way. As the bets come in during the week, the line moves.

Again....Vegas wants EQUAL bets on the two teams. If they get this, they automatically win by earning the juice.

pretty simple

Almost all initial lines are derived by algorithms that are designed to be predictive of an accurate outcome.

The line adjusts to betting activity to offset leverage.

Trying to inflate lines to try to get an advantage is counterproductive. The best way to get 50/50 action is to create good lines and then adjust.

If you start trying to inflate opening lines to reflect average public opinion, aware bettors are going to undercut it and it will backfire on you and you will get leveraged on an inflated line which would not be good, and if you try to readjust to far you will get middled which could possibly wipe out an entire sportsbook.

With the Internet resulting in a more informed bettor, the best way to get 50/50 action is to set a good line and adjust accordingly.

Most of these things are tales of more nefarious bookies from back in the day.

Most of the lines aren't even created by casinos anymore, but by outside statistician companies

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is absolutely NOT a prediction by Vegas as to who will win. The initial line is created as a prediction on how they believe the avg bettor will bet. Most people perceive the Bengals as the stronger team and Vegas expects higher bets on them. Therefore, they set the line to get money moving our way. As the bets come in during the week, the line moves.

Again....Vegas wants EQUAL bets on the two teams. If they get this, they automatically win by earning the juice.

pretty simple

You know what you're doing and My last bookie was shut down. Can you be my bookie?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And now the prerequisite explanation for how Vegas handicaps games...

 

 

Vegas is not prediciting that Cincinnati will beat the Panthers by 7 points. The only thing Vegas cares about is making money. Vegas ultimately wants to have an equal number of bets for both teams, and that is how they derive the spreads.  The point spread may change a number of times up until the game starts, based on how many bets are going for one team or the other.

 

Take this past weekend for example. On Friday the Bengals/Pats line was Even, meaning there was no spread either way and you basically could pick whichever team you thought would win, aka a "pick'em". 

 

A lot of bettors put their money on the Bengals, which in turn moved the spread towards the Bengals favor all the way to -3 by the time the game started.  So if you were like me and bet on the game at the last minute, you had to take the Bengals as 3 point favorites, which means the Bengals had to win by more than 3 points for me to win.  Dumb bet by me.

 

At least others have taken on this task.

 

Thank you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am a little fuzzy but that is not exactly how it works.

It is a prediction based on advanced analytics that take into account every player, weather, stadium, etc.

It is meant to be accurate, but you are correct that they want it to be even and don't want to be leveraged to much on one side of the other and so when betting starts spread will adjust accordingly.

This is correct. The odds-makers will rarely try to predict which way the money will go based on popular opinion. The exception would be things like setting a line on UK vs Germany in the UK where the line will likely be irrational.

 

There are plenty of professional handicappers out there running their own data so an irrational line will get jumped on very quickly unless the fish are offsetting it.

 

edit: by oddsmakers I mean the stats companies like accuscore. The actual sports books in the casinos may judgmentally move the lines but the initial line provided to the casinos is data driven.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People always point out that Vegas sets the line to induce betting on both sides, not to represent the likely outcome/team strengths/ect, however these two things usually coincide. I'd say 90% of the time the line is a fair representation when all measurable factors are taken into account, and only when public opinion greatly overrates or underrates one side do they shift the line accordingly.

Yeah. I doubt Vegas is trying to predict public opinion much on a Panthers game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Honestly, I don't think Canales is on the hot seat at all right now. He inherited a bad team with little depth and a QB who came at a high price and got no coaching in his first season (coupled with some physical limitations that require different game planning).  I think he and the Teppers both knew this was going to be a situation where he had to show progress in more than just the QB position to keep his chances going. And, well, we might not like it but there's progress being shown. The defense has shown some good games and some terrible games. That, especially over last year's effort, is a remarkable growth. As bad as we look at times this year on defense, we are nowhere near as bad as we were last season. Nowhere near. Brown came back and shored things up, and both free agent pickups and draft picks seem to be helping. It's not a finished product yet, but it isn't embarrassing (at least on a consistent basis as before). On offense, well,  Bryce has done better. He's not putting up big numbers, but we're sitting at .500 at the mid-season point, which is a far shot better than we have been. Bryce probably isn't our answer at QB (unless he really turns it up when he comes back from injury), but our running game is stronger, our receiver corps is markedly better (to the eye if not on paper), we've got some decent tight ends for once and our O-line had been looking decent to good (at least until Buffalo opened up a machine gun on them... ouch). If Bryce just holds the line here as he's doing, we'll finish with an okay record for once. If he does poorly, it's just another rinse repeat season for us. Either way, I think we could either go QB in the draft or look for a solid free agent back there.  All that being said, I think that Canales has made a stronger case for his future here than he is making for his present here. Play calling could be much stronger, more inventive and more able to exploit opportunities. He needs someone in the coaching booth who can see the whole field making those calls while he manages the team and the game. That's going to take a step of maturity on his part. And I think Ejero moves on after this season, here's hoping he gets a HC gig next season (good for him and even better for the compensation we'd get).  All that said, if this team does completely collapse after all these injuries, all bets are off. If he can hold the team together with these injuries and make it to that late bye-week, then he's going to be here. If we can somehow snag a wild card spot (and we are honestly very much in the hunt) then the sky is the limit.
    • I think realistically they will give him year 3. He has to make changes this off season on a few things because his long term future depends on it :   A - Needs an OC. Weather that is Idzik or someone else he has to give someone else a chance. Offensive play calling is too rollercoaster. Hopefully having someone focused on that solely will bring some rhythm and cohesiveness to the offense.    B - Whatever the hell they are doing in preseason needs to stop. Too cute, just get your starters ready for the season. All this overthinking how to split reps and who calling plays is not it. Maybe in an established program you can have that. Right now everyone needs to get better at their 1 job.    C -  DC needs to go. Too much inconsistency here but the end is that the defense is always exploitable. Got to make the right hire here. It looks like the talent is starting to grow on this side of the ball, don't waste it running back with Evero again.     D - QB needs to be answered. Personally I am 50/50 on BY9. Can he come back and finish strong and help this team get some Ws against a tough schedule or will it be time to move on. If its time to move on they need a good plan in place, FA QBs this year look rough. My guess is we bring in Zach Wilson if BY9 is out. I doubt the Colts are letting Jones walk.  Drafting a guy but always a crap shoot, plus where they draft and who falls. we will see.   
    • I am fine drafting a QB but we do need to be realistic about this upcoming draft class. More than likely, a great/good QB option may not be available at our pick. It's looking like an extremely weak QB class.  It might be a better idea to make that move late, as this class does seem to be heavy with guys with attributes but a lot of warts. I would hate to miss out on a valuable contributor and potentially core member on another QB reach. Play the board. BPA. Get better as an overall team.
×
×
  • Create New...