Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Stephen Hill


Recommended Posts

i dont think people realize just how bad he was when he got here and how much of a project he really is.

 

he might be more naturally talented than the other WRs on the roster not named kelvin benjamin, but he's not "better" or at least better prepared than the other guys who have roster spots.

 

i have a feeling that they are having to start from ground zero with this guy so it may take a while. i think it should be worth it when they get through with him, but i don't anticipate that being any time soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wrs aren't really the problem at this point. He's probably not better than what we have and with no injuries at the position, there really isn't a reason to bring him up

agreed.

 

someone ahead of him would have to get hurt or really start messing up their assignments or start dropping a lot of balls. the guys we have right now are doing everything they are supposed to be doing. there's no reason to demote them for a guy who is still more of a work in progress than anyone else on the roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no , us panthers just like keeping talent on the bench and p squad

 

which is something that every team in the league does because uh that's what both of those things are for

 

so the panthers are smarter than 27 other teams because a talented player like hill made it through waivers to us and we signed him yet the panthers are somehow also too dumb to play him at the same time?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

which is something that every team in the league does because uh that's what both of those things are for

 

so the panthers are smarter than 27 other teams because a talented player like hill made it through waivers to us and we signed him yet the panthers are somehow also too dumb to play him at the same time?

hes more talented then all our current w.r other then cotch and k.b

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i dont think people realize just how bad he was when he got here and how much of a project he really is.

he might be more naturally talented than the other WRs on the roster not named kelvin benjamin, but he's not "better" or at least better prepared than the other guys who have roster spots.

i have a feeling that they are having to start from ground zero with this guy so it may take a while. i think it should be worth it when they get through with him, but i don't anticipate that being any time soon.

People had visions of him starting and leading the league in receptions within a week of his signing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP
    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
×
×
  • Create New...