Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Steve Smith Is ON WFNZ Having A Confessional, Won't Let the Story End


FootballMaestro

Recommended Posts

this has only happened to one guy in nfl history, and that's steve smith

 

Pretty much.

 

 

But sports isn't a business! !!!

 

This particular team certainly wasn't run like a business before Gettleman got here.

 

(Smitty's honestly not the only player to whine a little bit about that fact)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not too many guys that have meant what Steve did to this organization have been let go by their teams the way he was.

 

Peyton, Montana, Rice, Brees, Warner, etc. The list goes on and on. It's a business. Smitty has every right to be angry, and I would be too, but he needs to understand that this stuff just happens. Can't blame anyone, it had to be done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

oh okay so if they're different things then i guess you have no business trying to make it personally relatable to anyone here then

glad we're done with that

If they want to try to compare what Steve meant to the panthers, vs what they mean to their organization then I want to hear it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have a family?

 

 

you know there are people who get paid a lot less than millions of dollars doing harder poo than getting paid to play a game that don't get to see their families

 

 

if steve smith didn't want to be away from his family. he could have you know retired.

 

i guess that's steve smith being selfish with his millions and his 4 kids and wife. smitty is looking for pity from people like you.

 

yes i'm going to pity a man that already has MILLLIONS, knows how to invest his money properly, for being away from his family when he could be retired at the age of 35.

 

gtfo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you believe half that poo you are gullible. I guarantee you that most of that stuff wasn't said.

That might have been what Smitty heard, but not what was said. If you get my meaning.

 

I'm pretty sure a good deal (maybe even the vast majority) of what Smitty claims was 'said' to him probably wasn't.  It's just how he took it.  It's the old 'so what you're really saying to me is' thing.

 

Sad to see this stuff, but I wan't exactly expecting to hear an evenhanded version of events from Smitty anyway.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...