Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

shula is a symptom, not the disease


Fiz

Recommended Posts

....with zero NFL caliber tackles.

 

 

 

Someone pour me a whiskey.

The Falcons are trotting out one NFL caliber LINEMAN, and Matt Ryan is going to throw for 5,000 yards. 

 

there are ways to work around talent deficiencies. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shula should never have been promoted to OC.

End of story.

He was one of the last people standing when the rest of the league thought Rivera was going to be axed and they deferred to Newton's personal comfort level.

Sometimes, the people who make us grow, are not the ones who make us 'comfortable'.

This x100.

JR isnt a problem bc he wants a run focused attack. I dont think the good coaches want to coach here, probably the same reason Luck stayed at Stanford. We're just a bargain bin team that scrapes the bottom of the barrel for nearly every hire

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

This is eery.

 

 

In Tampa Bay GM Rich McKay stepped in and forced Dungy to fire Shula. Their relationship wasn't the same after that. I hope it doesn't come down to it.

 

Then Tampa went on to win a SB.

 

 

We will only get a new OC when Rivera is no longer the head coach.

 

 

I don't see him firing his own guys.

 

Fine by me Rivera isn't a spectacular head coach by any means.

 
 

The problem with Ron firing Shula is that Ron himself approves the playbook and the strategy on gamedays. So firing Shula is also him admitting he isn't that great of a head coach.

 

 

Or people would take it as a sign that what they were doing wasn't working so they decided to learn from their mistake and progressively move toward having a more dynamic offense. If Rivera did that it would say more about him as a HC actually because right now he's average at best and a move like firing Shula would peg him up.

 

Then again nothing says Carolina Panther football like sticking with what doesn't work for far too long. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Falcons are trotting out one NFL caliber LINEMAN, and Matt Ryan is going to throw for 5,000 yards. 

 

there are ways to work around talent deficiencies. 

 

So is your thesis that the reason we are not going to work around these deficiencies is because Jerry Richardson doesn't want the offense to be that creative, or because Shula is not that creative?  I'm still trying to understand if you think Richardson is choosing anyone but the HC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont know what you want to call the NFL. Passing league, Rushing league, whatever.  All I know is the calls you get from the refs and risk/reward you get for being a passing team outweighs any reason for having a heavy running team. At this point the rules committee and the refs are funneling teams to more passing.

 

You cant sneeze on receivers anymore, can barely hit the QB, tackling restrictions. . it just doesnt make sense to not take advantage of that. 40 yard penalty cause this guy blew a kiss at at a receiver while he was running his route. Now the receivers are getting bigger and it just looks like the defense can only answer by getting to the QB as quick as possible.

 

Fiz, you could at least make an effort to use a euphimism instead of 'when he's dead'. whatever

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally I don't think this has anything to do with management. The biggest problem is the players. 

 

The team is much like a building. Removing Hardy is like removing a key column holding up the building. This makes CJ and the DTs less effective. When they are less effective the opponents OL can bully Luke and the other LBs which causes a chain reaction into the secondary. When the DEs arent producing then the DTs wont produce which cause the LBs not to produce which exposes our secondary. 

 

Basically its the opposite of last year where our DL was super elite providing constant pressure which freed up the LBs to do amazing plays which made the secondary look amazing. 

 

1 or 2 players have a chain reaction to the overall team chemistry. Removing Cam or Luke will cause the offense/defense to fail but in this case I think Hardy maybe the key piece that caused the defense to fail. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

unfortunately, it is very difficult to argue against that theory

he cares more about saving money and getting players with good charactor regardless of talent , and never takes chances on players with a track record
Link to comment
Share on other sites

he cares more about saving money and getting players with good charactor regardless of talent , and never takes chances on players with a track record

How have the players that do have character issues done with us?  How much have you enjoyed the "spotlight" that it brings?  I'd rather not have it as a fan, much less as someone in the front office.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

he cares more about saving money and getting players with good charactor regardless of talent , and never takes chances on players with a track record

 

Like, say, drafting a quarterback with an NCAA scandal and a report of a stolen laptop on his record?

 

The notion that Jerry Richardson doesn't care about winning is one of the flat out stupidest ideas that hangs around this board.

 

He may have a different idea of how to win than some on here have, but the idea that he doesn't care about winning is just ridiculous.  No one who's spent any time around him gives that any credence at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally I don't think this has anything to do with management. The biggest problem is the players.

The team is much like a building. Removing Hardy is like removing a key column holding up the building. This makes CJ and the DTs less effective. When they are less effective the opponents OL can bully Luke and the other LBs which causes a chain reaction into the secondary. When the DEs arent producing then the DTs wont produce which cause the LBs not to produce which exposes our secondary.

Basically its the opposite of last year where our DL was super elite providing constant pressure which freed up the LBs to do amazing plays which made the secondary look amazing.

1 or 2 players have a chain reaction to the overall team chemistry. Removing Cam or Luke will cause the offense/defense to fail but in this case I think Hardy maybe the key piece that caused the defense to fail.

Injuries and personnel changes are expected. It is the job of the coaching staff to adjust their game plans accordingly and so far that has not been the case. I don't know how its all the players fault when the coaches are the ones who select the players and implement game plans. I agree execution comes down to the players but if you have seen the last two weeks both sides are at fault and in my opinion more on the coaches who havent made proper game plans with the players they currently have.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like, say, drafting a quarterback with an NCAA scandal and a report of a stolen laptop on his record?

 

The notion that Jerry Richardson doesn't care about winning is one of the flat out stupidest ideas that hangs around this board.

 

He may have a different idea of how to win than some on here have, but the idea that he doesn't care about winning is just ridiculous.  No one who's spent any time around him gives that any credence at all.

 

I am unconvinced that Jerry Richardson's (like most owners) idea of winning doesn't begin and end at the nearly 10 billion dollars a year in revenue the league brings in.  Why should I believe otherwise?  This is just show business and we pay the same for a poo show.

 

Perhaps (probably) I'm just bitter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am unconvinced that Jerry Richardson's (like most owners) idea of winning doesn't begin and end at the nearly 10 billion dollars a year in revenue the league brings in.  Why should I believe otherwise?  This is just show business and we pay the same for a poo show.

 

Perhaps (probably) I'm just bitter.

 

Well for one, we've spent pretty much right up to the salary cap every season up till now.  A lot of teams don't do that.

 

More relevant to me though is the fact that anyone who's actually worked with him directly always says he badly wants his team to be a perennial contender.  I take those opinions way more seriously than I do fan speculation.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Took cash out for 84 before the usa game. Didn't like the corners. If this one hits will probably put 100 on Arizona to cover and the over against Purdue 
    • This is so much more than rankings.  Got tired of same old topics.  I see the thread beginning, "Breaking News: Panthers...." and then I open it and read the complete title of the thread "...OT Jordan Gross Retires."  So here is something to chew on:  Don't hurt my feelings.  LZ rates the bounty of talent at each position and I provide a quote from his article.  It changed my approach. https://www.nfl.com/news/ranking-11-position-groups-in-2026-nfl-draft-from-strongest-to-weakest-edge-rusher-linebacker-loaded #1: Edge: Lance predicts the Edge position will, once again, dominate the first round and it is the strongest position.  If the Panthers draft an edge on day 1 or day 2, Wow.  Phillips, Scourton, Princely, Jones, along with Hampton, Gipson, and Incoom.  Personally, I think we are going to let the others grab the Edge players forcing other positions to drop to us.  This strategy does not discount the fact that if a stud edge falls to 19… LZ:  “This class figures to provide a strong number of future starters, with as many as 17 players poised to come off the board in the first three rounds, but the quality of depth will trail off on Day 3. The edge defenders will rule the first round.” #2 Linebacker:  The Panthers added a starting Mike ILB in free agency, but the rest of the roster is depth. The need is for an off-ball LB who can cover.  Since it is my opinion that we draft a STARTER here, I would expect a first- or second-round pick  However, he makes a comment about the depth, suggesting that quality players could be found on early day 3. LZ: “Anthony Hill Jr. is a talented three-down option who could go on Day 1, while Jake Golday, CJ Allen and Jacob Rodriguez look like Round 2 selections as potential early starters. The linebacker group stays strong in Rounds 3 and 4, with decent depth stretching into the fifth round.” #3. Interior Offensive Line:  This one surprised me, powered by some guards that could go as early as round 2.  Remember, LZ is rating these positions based on projected starters.  He mentions that Center is strong based on short-armed OTs that will transition to center, claiming that starters can be found into the fifth round.  That is good news for the Panthers, who do not really need an immediate starter, but they need a future starter who can play a few years on a rookie contract. LZ: “Meanwhile, Connor Lew, Sam Hecht, Logan Jones and Brian Parker II could all become future starting centers, while Trey Zuhn III might not be far behind. The number of starters and the depth into Round 5 is what helps this group stand out.” #4. Wide Receiver:   Finding potential starters at WR is probably easier than C, but let’s not assume that WR is not a need in Charlotte.  TMac needs someone who can keep defenses from cheating in coverage.  Coker is very promising, but the others? I get the feeling that they are hoping XL comes around in year 3.  Regardless, if a WR is there that makes them better, they could pull the trigger–again–just not in round 1.  If the Panthers grab a WR, it will be for a 3rd-5th WR, which makes LZ’s comment interesting: LZ:  “In terms of starting talent, this offering is a little softer than those from some recent years, but there will be plenty of quality depth for WR3/4 roles inside of the first five rounds.” #5 Cornerback:  Yes, we have Horn and Jackson (in his final year at age 29) and Smith-Wade has been fairly good. Thornton was the second-rated rookie CB before his injury last year.  Could we use depth at nickel?  An outside CB?  I think we could add both, frankly. Future starters.  I love the nickel from Duke, who is not mentioned.   LZ:  “The depth at wide corner is lacking, but there are some very talented nickelbacks who will step into starting roles fairly quickly, including Avieon Terrell, Treydan Stukes, D'Angelo Ponds and Keionte Scott. It's worth noting that this might be the fastest cornerback group, from top to bottom, that we've ever seen.” #6(T) Safety: This prognosis could be why we re-signed Scott. However, it could also foreshadow why we might take a safety in rounds 1 or 2.  In my view, I think the value at S is not comparable, per round, to the value at other positions.  Remember the comment about moving Smith-Wade to safety?  I wonder if that was a stupid comment or someone in the know spewing inside info.  I want a safety, but I am not crazy about them in this draft. LZ:  “Ballhawking safeties like Bud Clark and A.J. Haulcy offer future starting value in the second round, as does Jalen Kilgore, who is a big, explosive down safety. I'm also a fan of VJ Payne from Kansas State, but in general, this group becomes average, depth-level talent fairly quickly on Day 3.” #6 (T) Tight End:  Sadiq is not described as elite, but could be a first-rounder.  Frankly, from the sounds of this, it is either reach for Sadiq in round 1 or wait until round 3.  I am not seeing a TE in this draft.  I know the Panthers want one, but how much?   LZ: (After Sadiq round 1)--We might not see many second-round TE picks, but this group is fairly deep in Rounds 3 through 5, featuring some solid pass catchers and a very strong run blocker in Sam Roush out of Stanford. The 2026 draft could produce a sneaky-high number of tight ends who earn second NFL contracts.” #8 (T) Defensive Line: This group is hard to gauge, and drafting one where the Panthers pick seems a bit awkward on day 1.  Nobody is worth #19 and the elite DTs will be long gone by #53 or whatever.  However, I like some of the second-tier players.  It seems NTs are abundant, but 3Ts are in short supply.  Maybe a player like Holten or Jackson in round 3 or (sleeper) Capehart around 3-4. LZ:  (Borderline first-rounders:  Banks, McDonald, Woods)  “Beyond that talented trio, the position offers a series of future starters/rotational contributors on Day 2.” #8 (T) Offensive Tackle:  Yikes.  LZ is not really high on this group, and he provides reasons.  My take?  Many are good pass protectors, but struggie in run support. Walker is seeming like a great signing right now.  I think we grab the RT later, but LZ’s comments about mid round talent demonstrates that there is a lot of risk from top to bottom this year.  Personally, I think we might draft Parker early or Crownover later. LZ: Top prospects like Francis Mauigoa and Spencer Fano come with shorter-than-desired arms, while the gargantuan Kadyn Proctor is coming off a highly uneven season in pass protection. Caleb Lomu, Monroe Freeling and Max Iheanachor all have talent but are less polished than teams might like. There is an adequate number of starting-caliber bookends available early, but it becomes highly speculative for teams hunting quality depth by the middle of the third round. 10: Running Back.  Pass 11.  (Last) Quarterback:  This may be a place to find a developmental gem, an emergency QB who has longshot potential to compete should Bryce fail.  If people feel that this class is as bad as LZ suggests, could a gem fall into undrafted free agent status?   I think I would watch that dynamic. LZ;  Ty Simpson has a chance to become an NFL starter, but this is a below-average quarterback class with a low number of future starters and quality backups to choose from. It wouldn't shock me to see QB-hungry teams kick the can down the road and wait until next year.”   READING THE TEA LEAVES:  Of course, this is not to suggest that Lance Zierlein knows all and sees all.  But I will say that he is a good talent evaluator and he talks to the people in the front offices that we do not have access to.  We are often misled by hacks making crap up to get clicks and hits–and this is part of that environment, so “grain of salt.”   After reading this, I had the following thoughts: Taking an OT in round 1 seems like a mistake under most circumstances.  I think we need to find a RT to develop later in the draft.  I think we will add someone like Jude Bowery from Boston College in round 4.  I think we need to look at OT on both sides as if we have 1 year to groom a starter. If there is a run on Edges, a solid WR will be sitting there.  We could have a situation where the BPAs at #19 are either an edge or WR.  How would an elite WR help us?   At safety, if a team falls in love with Oregon FS Thienemen, the lack of depth behind him could force a reach. Could Carolina be that team?   The Panthers signed a decent C to a one-year contract. Centers with eventual starting ability can be found in rounds 3, 4, and even 5. Expect the Panthers to draft a center in round 4.  Yes, round 4.  I even predict Brian Parker from Duke.  Eerie, huh? We will be drafting a LB early, but I am guessing second round.  The next panther starting W ILB is going to be Rodriguez or Golday.  Madly on fire with my specific predictions–in round 2. Tight End?  Unless we dive in early, I do not see the upgrade.  I am willing to predict that we don’t draft a TE. Cornerback:  We will add a CB, probably a nickel (where there is value) late.  Defensive Line: Depending on what happens in round 1, Defensive line could be a late day 2 pick.   This may shock some of you.  I live on the edge.   ROUND 1:  Best value:  Edge, Wide Receiver, Cornerback.  I predict overdrafting OT and a run on edge will drop WRs and maybeCB  lower and a great value could land in our lap.  Could we do it again?  In the words of Brittany Spears, “Oops.” Corner?  Well, I think we will move Smith-Wade to FS at some point.  Smart, calls coverages.  Jackson is gone after 2026. . Get a nickel later, however, unless a stud CB falls. Please don’t draft TE here. Edge?  On paper, we are strong, but you can never have enough pass rushers.  We will leave awesome at one position that we may not have listed as a primary need: Edge, CB, or WR. ROUND 2:  Best Value: Linebacker.  I do not see us drafting another position here.  LB–Hill (longshot), Rodgriguez, Golday. Edge (second tier–Height, Jacas, Moore, Young, Howell–would be hard to overlook, but our GM is a former LB)  S A Haulcy is a darkhorse possibility. ROUND 3:  Best Value:  Defensive line. Halton (OK), Jackson (Fl. St), Durant (Penn State).   ROUND 4:  Best Value: Center.  Slaughter, Hecht, Jones, Lew, Coogan, Jones, Zuhn.  This is the only real option.  We should take our center in round 4. ROUND 5:  Best value:  They will be looking for a developmental OT here if not addressed sooner.  Jude Bowery ((BC), D. Crownover (RT-Tex AM), Wagner (RT-Notre Dame) seem promising.   
    • Spot-on. D-line and FS are much bigger immediate needs than OT or WR. Look at the current roster and the fact that they have not brought in any new players at those positions. 
×
×
  • Create New...