Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Anyone in the IT biz?


shinner

Recommended Posts

So....thinking about what I am going to do once I get off of worker's comp and expecting that the industry I worked in either won't have me or won't have anything available, I've been thinking about doing something else.

Thought about web design as I've done 4 or 5 sites on a volunteer basis but I really don't have any graphic design background so I'm limited in how purty I can make a site look.

The local community college sent out their fall catalog and I was looking at the various IT programs. While the descriptions are clear enough, I'm not sure which one I would or should look into. They offer the standard MCSA and MCSE but also a CompTIA A+. Description says Microsoft views a CompTIA cert as equivalent of passing the MCSA elective exam. The CompTIA A+ class costs $2700 while the MCSA is $5300 (MCSE is $3900). If I were to take any of these I would most likely have to put the cost on a VISA.

So who has the 411 on this? Help a broke and battered brotha out...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd shoot for MSCE. A+ isn't that big anymore, especially since it's a one time test and you have it forever. MSCE is worth the money.

IT isn't the boom it once was though. With the job market, less IT jobs, and more outsourcing it's harder to get in than it was late 90's etc. But like anything if you work at it it'll pay off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the info....not looking forward to putting so much on a credit card but I don't have a whole lot of options.

I do have quite a few contacts in data centers around northern VA so I could probably at least give them a call and see if they know of available jobs. Some are at server farms and some run their own data centers. I was already thinking of giving them a call just to see if they were looking for any maintenance guys (shift baby-sitters).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the info....not looking forward to putting so much on a credit card but I don't have a whole lot of options.

I do have quite a few contacts in data centers around northern VA so I could probably at least give them a call and see if they know of available jobs. Some are at server farms and some run their own data centers. I was already thinking of giving them a call just to see if they were looking for any maintenance guys (shift baby-sitters).

There is a tax credit for this year and next year on tuition and books. You get 100% back up to $2000.00 and 25% after that up to getting back a max of $2400.00. You can be part time. Look into it and that should help some on the finances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a developer I can't comment with complete confidence, but in general I think certifications are crap. Getting a certification demonstrates you know a particular technology. But the industry moves so fast that the ability to keep up is far more important - that's why experience is so important. It's a massive catch-22 and it sucks donkey balls.

If you know you can get a job with a certification then go for it. I'd try to pull whatever strings to have to get experience first though. The IT guy at my old job had zero certifications, he was a friend of the systems admin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a developer I can't comment with complete confidence, but in general I think certifications are crap. Getting a certification demonstrates you know a particular technology. But the industry moves so fast that the ability to keep up is far more important - that's why experience is so important. It's a massive catch-22 and it sucks donkey balls.

If you know you can get a job with a certification then go for it. I'd try to pull whatever strings to have to get experience first though. The IT guy at my old job had zero certifications, he was a friend of the systems admin.

I'll second that. Unfortunately getting in the door isn't so much about what acronymns you can put on your resume as the contacts you have to get you on the inside. Once someone knows that you can adapt and take on the ever changing technology landscape with aplomb, you're good as gold. As can be said with any job, network, network, network so you can get some doors open to you.

That said, it certainly is important to be at least seemingly knowledgeable about the position you would want to apply for. If getting a certain certifcation would help you in that area then it's money well spent and definitely can't hurt your cause. Like the quoted post above said though, don't count on a certain certification equaling an instant hire unless said job is specifically asking for that cert. Good luck!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You gotta start somewhere, and classes/certs are as good as anywhere.

I'd look into database admin, IT security (big!) or networking - the Cisco cert seems to carry a little more weight than the Microsoft certs; as it's perceived as tougher to get and more techie.

Interpersonal skills, time management and following procedures type stuff are just as important as computer skills in the corporate IT world IMHO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's well advanced though Deac...I was just looking into it. According to the one site I was looking at, you should have 5 yrs exp in IT security. Hell, I don't have a single piece of paper indicating that I have formal training in any aspect of IT.

I need a sort of "guide to changing careers during middle-age after spending 20+ years in a different field" type of thing. :)

BTW....CISSP looks tough! Well done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thinkin' I should just look into a CompTIA A+ to start. I've built enough computers and my own home network with multiple PCs and even a media server that I should be able to pass it without too much trouble.

A+ isn't that hard, you have to memorize the official names of things even if you know what they do etc. If you are getting certs, I would stick with MSCE and then Cisco (Cisco huge). Thing about A+ is once you get it, you have it, and that's why it's not that HUGE anyway. CISCO only lasts for so long I believe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I were getting started in the IT field I would look to gear more towards a network security route...that field is only going to grow and grow and won't be outsourced as readily overseas like many of the app dev jobs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cripes am I confused :)

Only thing I think I'm sure on is that I need to establish some sort of foundation (A+, CCENT, etc) before I should even be thinking about MCSE, MCSA, CCNA or security stuff.

I am basically starting out on the ground floor here. The only thing I really have going for me is that I have over 20 years experience troubleshooting and repairing various UPS systems (some with networking capabilities that had needed troubleshooting...generally came down to incorrect configurations resulting in no operation or conflicts with other devices). What I know about computers and networking comes from building my own PCs and setting up my own network and server. IOW not a damn thing that says I really know what I'm doing. I don't think that's gonna wow anyone looking to hire IT work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Some here have it wrong when based on hard numbers that determine a game. Here's a lengthy and deep analysis. Don't continue reading if you are not willing to look at the good and bad of your favorite players. The pass blocking was horrendous in the first half, and Dalton still kept the game competitive. Dalton was obviously directed to throw it to Thomas. Thomas ran his route horribly and didn't come back to the ball. The DB had an easy path to just race in front of Thomas. He's a TE who should be using his body to keep a DB from doing that. Lazy play by Thomas. The throw was good and it was the correct read (delivered 15 yards downfield with 3 to 5 yards to the sideline is where that ball was placed for Thomas). Here's how the drives went for the Falcons game. Drive 1: Ekwonu killed it. Drive 2: Heavy Dalton passing (Johnson & Moore). TD Drive 3: Dalton short passing (J.Sanders & XL). Punt Drive 4: Heavy Hubbard touches. FG Drive 5: Hubbard/M.Sanders touches. Punt (Running game failed and forced Dalton into 2 long passing downs. Got a PI to keep drive alive on one.) Drive 6: Heavy Dalton passing (5 targeted receivers). TD Drive 7: Running & short passing game to open the 2nd half. FG (Hubbard, Mingo, M.Sanders, J.Sanders, Thomas) OL ended the drive with a 2nd and 19. This is the ONLY drive the Panthers had for 3Q. Defensive failure Drive 8: Heavy Hubbard touches with TE targets. INT (Ian Thomas gave up INT with a lazy route and zero awareness of using his body to keep the DB from easily crossing his body. The play was called for Thomas and the play worked perfectly with him cutting through the zone to a wide open pocket. All Thomas had to do was get his body in between the trailing defender and the ball while staying on a line to the sideline. Thomas rounded his break and drifted to 18 yards deep at the end of his route. Gave the advantage to the speed of the trail defender. Pass was on point for a 15 yard crossing route. Play call was good. Receiver execution of a dig route was awful). The defense and Thomas in the 2nd half ended the game. Scoring % is 50% after this INT. That's still good for an offense. [Down 15 points with 5 minutes left. Running game has produced 6 points in 5 of 8 drives lasting 3 to 5 minutes per drive. Dalton has been successful on 2 of the 3 drives he was called on with the 1 failed drive stopped with bad pass blocking and relying on a TE.] Drive 9: All pass with defense protecting a lead. OL pass blocking fails again putting Dalton into a 2nd and 20. Dalton gets it to a 4th & 4 and throws incomplete with Ekwonu (one on one) thrown into him in 2 seconds forcing a high throw. (Canales, Dalton and Johnson were on point for a likely 1st down. Ekwonu pass blocking failed.) Turnover on downs. Drive 10: 2 minutes to go down 18 points. All pass. INT (Dalton didn't anticipate the CB jumping the route after reading a deep zone) The defense only stopped 2 drives from scoring. The OL lacks discipline and is a liability with their pass blocking. No one can excuse Ekwonu for what he does in pass blocking. It continues to cost the Panthers late in games, and on critical 4th down pass plays. The OL is very good at run blocking, but the RBs are not as good as fans want to believe. They are not playmakers to open up a game with a strong run blocking OL. The RBs are only good enough for controlling clock with a lead (and that needs to be more consistent). Too many missed opportunities from the RBs behind this OL. The TEs and Mingo are liabilities in the passing game. Their mistakes plus the lack of discipline on the OL is leading to way too many 3rd & longs. 7 of 12 3rd downs were long. 4 of the 7 were 3rd & 10+. The most efficient part of the team against the Falcons was Dalton, Johnson, Coker and Canales' play calling. XL is close to being in this group. Negative plays that resulted in 3rd & longs, failed 4th downs, INTs, and fumbles lost : Hubbard 3; Ekwonu 4; Thomas 2; J.Sanders 1; M.Sanders 1; Lewis 1; Nijman 1; Dalton 1. 1st downs/TDs converted: Rushing: Hubbard 6; M.Sanders 1; Dalton 1. Passing: Dalton 13 (Johnson 6; M.Sanders 1; Coker 2; J.Sanders 1; Legette 2; Hubbard 1). Top 3 liabilities: 1. Ekwonu 2. Hubbard 3. Thomas. Top 3 strengths: 1. Dalton 2. Hubbard 3. Johnson Anyone with a 1 doesn’t make a list. The goal is to have ZERO players on the liability list and 3 or more players on the strengths list. Then you want the opposite for the opponent to gauge the defense. Only 1 player of the Falcons made the liability list (Algiers with back to back runs for 0 yards on the 10th drive (final) of the game). Not a single Falcons OL with more than 1 critical mistake. Falcons only had 2 legit 3rd and longs all game (4 if you add the final plays of the game for them with the kneel downs). The Falcons converted 25 times in 9 drives. That makes them look better than the 5-0 Chiefs offense. Panthers' conversions by week: 1. 11; 2. 7; 3. 24; 4. 24; 5. 14; 6. 21. Dalton has been the key factor in the offense consistently converting 20+. The Bears game was planned around Hubbard carrying it to keep the Panthers defense off the field, and that failed. That is the only game Dalton has started that there hasn't been a single drive over 4 minutes in the 1st half (Dalton targeted 2 WRs on 2 passes until the 2 minute warning against the Bears). Realize the pass blocking OL and their discipline is a liability. The RBs lack of consistency is a liability. The TEs are a huge problem. The Panthers need a 3rd down back desperately, and Mingo should be converted to that role for now. The run blocking OL is carrying average RBs. Dalton is good enough to win and has done well playing through poor pass blocking. The receivers outside of Mingo are executing well. Canales is getting receivers open and calling plays to beat the defense. That's the state of the offense. Good enough to win, but not on at a level to put up 40 points per game. The offense has to worry about keeping up with their defense rather than simply executing to be good and win games at the end. List Dalton's critical mistakes that have ended a drive. Ekwonu, Mingo & Thomas are responsible for 3 of his 4 interceptions. His 3rd or 4th and short passes have failed how many times without being impacted by a terrible block or dropped pass?  45 drives to look at. I've already told you 3 that are not on Dalton. 10 resulted in TDs & 3 were end of game/half. That leaves 29 drives. Go see how they ended, and who's responsible. I already know, and I don't think some of you are willing to acknowledge who the drive killers are on the offense. It's not Dalton leading the way. Tough truths.
    • Haven't had time to pay attention to college ball the last couple weeks but seems like all the mock drafts have Sanders, Hunter, and Ward in the top 5 and then kinda mixed bag after that. I like that Ward is a playmaker with a little Favre style in him, seems real comfortable leading the huddle. Very different vibe from the soft stuff we've dealt with the last couple years. I believe he would no doubt beat out BY in a camp battle for what it's worth
    • I agree with playing younger players as available.  I also appreciate the (6) for those of us who cannot count . . . 😉
×
×
  • Create New...