Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Section 545


0115

Recommended Posts

So this has nothing to do with last nights game however I did witness something interesting. During the 3rd and 4th Quarter there was a male and a female (panthers fan) talking to the security pointing to the top.

 

A few minutes passed and (cause I was to focused on the game) some thing happened. That same female talking to security pushed a guy(panthers fan) back and started beating the poo out of him. As security came, the male I mentioned in the beginning starts jawing with that guy and smacks him dead in the jaw.

 

After this happens, this man had a bloody mouth then starts jawing with a Steelers fan and as a result, this fan's three year old was scared as poo because of the tension that was going on, so the father starts to get more mad. Another Panthers fan and I had to calm this Steelers fan down because this dude had already been smacked hard twice. If any one could clarify what happened?

 

Male and Female(Panther Fans) reporting something happened around 3 mins left at the 3rd

 

The female threw the punch at 2mins into the 4th

 

The male threw the second punch at near Blounts touchdown.

 

The Steelers fan got into the argument with the guy after kickoff.

 

*****I forgot to mention we were sitting at row seven seats 10-11 and this happened two rows down. The male and female were not originally sitting there so this guy did something and followed them. The Steeler family was right in front of us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Other than the main reason attending football games isn't that enjoyable anymore is because everyone feels the need to want to fight, nobody wants their kids exposed to such things and the whole "this is my house" thing has gotten out of control.

 

Grown adults getting into schoolyard fist fights over a game.... think about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...