Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Peterson to play sunday...maybe Hardy next


Jmac

Recommended Posts

Keep in mind Hardy is great against the run while Addison struggles playing the run. The Lions passed the ball many times playing to Addison's strength yesterday. That may not be the case in the future.

Agreed..took Hardy a couple years to aquire that skill.Addison may have that ability,but needs reps to improve.As I said...better groom someone now because the reality is they won't resign him.Can't afford him besides everything else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keep in mind Hardy is great against the run while Addison struggles playing the run. The Lions passed the ball many times playing to Addison's strength yesterday. That may not be the case in the future.

THIS

We played great yesterday....but what the Lions do plays into what we could do great.

And the Lions T situation was a mess

A good balanced O? Without OL issues? I think missing Hardy will show more

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if carolina ever listened to the mass media, we would have signed ever top free agent wr this off season and passed on cam newton in the draft.  If there is anything I know about the carolina front office is, they do what they want regardless of what other people think.  I am pretty sure the process to bench hardy was put into place far before the outcry by the media.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP
    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
×
×
  • Create New...