Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Greg who?


Jmac

Recommended Posts

Once these guys get reps along with Frank Alexander coming back..we will be fine. When you have a stout defense you can deal with a loss like Hardy.The secondary seems to be much better also. So add Kony in the mix and they got this. Sorry Greg,you where not missed all that much today and probably less and less every game. You didn't want to play by the rules Greg...no problem....Mario's got this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's not sell Hardy short.  If he played, this probably would have been a shut out.  It took years to develop Hardy and he was coming to be an elite DE.  His lost will be missed, no matter how good we are.  All that said, we need to go ahead and release him.  The Hardy era is over unfortunately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hardy is a big piece to our d, he's a game changer hopefully this is a one time thing

 

It's not.  The media wants Hardy out period, and they will continue to beat that drum.  Why would Richardson bow to the media's demands only once?  Like I said we need to go ahead and release Hardy right now, get it over with.  His presence will be missed, no matter how good we are in spite of him not being there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP
    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
×
×
  • Create New...