Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers in the news for all the wrong reasons

Jmac

By Jmac,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Jmac Grand Master

Jmac

Posted
Posted

Last weekend this team went on the road, and beat a division rival with a back up QB. Sirius NFL radio did not talk about it at all.It was like it never happened.If it wasn't for the Hardy fiasco.Cams donkey Kong comments, and Smith cursing us out...we would not exist to the national media.R.R needs to turn this negative into a positive.Being "relevant" for the right reasons starts Sunday.I am proud of this team for the players they have, how they give back to the community, and the overall stand up guys they are. This team is more then one player and if need be, will carry on as strong as ever, no matter what may happen.they need to have one goal and one focus...to be the first NFC South team to repeat as champions...2015 NFL South champions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PanthersClinic Newbie

PanthersClinic

Posted
Posted

<p>Nothing new is it? We're the team known for lesbian cheerleaders causing trouble in bathrooms. The team known for domestic violence (Rae Carruth trial, the RB who was shot by his GF, Greg Hardy). Then we had Smith beating up his teammates over the years</p>

<p>&nbsp;</p>

<p>The NFL problems, Panthers problems, etc, are really just a microcosm of bigger problems in American society.</p>

<p>&nbsp;</p>

<p>&nbsp;</p>

<p>It's important to draw a line between criminal and silly though. Cam is immature but he's not harming anyone, just damaging his own rep.</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • jessicasmith0
      Does JetBlue have free cancellation?

      By jessicasmith0 · Posted

      https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP
    • tukafan21
      Mason Graham Bandwagon

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • Carolina Mike
      Mason Graham Bandwagon

      By Carolina Mike · Posted

      This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
×
×
  • Create New...