Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Smitty may be even more pissed than we thought (Panthers related)


RelaxImaPro

Recommended Posts

i will say that i really don't think we're going to walk in to that stadium and get a win

smith will probably look good as the ravens beat us to boot

thankfully that has little bearing on the long term prospects of this team

Nah...we will smother them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sure he had a rough start to the season in the first half of the first game, blah blah blah. Smith's hands have never been a question.

What's the bottom line?

89.

He dropped several tonight. His hands sucked last year, too.

Bottom line is he's average at best. He's gonna put up big numbers simply because Flacco throws 50+ times a game, but he's gonna be inefficient all year. He's just padding his numbers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

where have you been for the last 5 years?

 

that was true once, back in the early 2000s, but hasn't been for several seasons.

 

There you go again.  What the hell does that mean?  Are you suggesting that Steve Smith hasn't mattered since the early 2000s?  What are you talking about?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He dropped several tonight. His hands sucked last year, too.

Bottom line is he's average at best. He's gonna put up big numbers simply because Flacco throws 50+ times a game, but he's gonna be inefficient all year. He's just padding his numbers.

 

So as the analysts are singing his praises, you are calling him average...What the fug, dude?  Did he piss in your Cheerios or something?  Just stop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He dropped several tonight. His hands sucked last year, too.

Bottom line is he's average at best. He's gonna put up big numbers simply because Flacco throws 50+ times a game, but he's gonna be inefficient all year. He's just padding his numbers.

 

yeah because a superbowl winning coach is focus on padding smith's stats.........you know how dumb that sounds

 

his hands sucked.......wtf are you getting this from???

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...