Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Smitty may be even more pissed than we thought (Panthers related)

RelaxImaPro

By RelaxImaPro,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Porn Shop Clerk Enthusiast

Porn Shop Clerk

Posted
Posted

To say he hurt the team more than he helped it is idiotic. Jake Delhomme wouldn't have made it even a full year without Steve bailing him out. We'd have been a carousel for QBs, ala the Cleveland Browns.

 

he had a pretty good year with moose when smitty was injured, but i'm not surprised you forgot about that

 

jakes decline happened when he started forcing smitty the ball, because smitty is a bully, and jake is a nice guy

 

then smitty stopped workiing for jake, and basically lead the charge to get him out of here.   i find it poetic justice that the same thing happened to him that happened to jake

Link to comment
Share on other sites
top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
Posted

Smitty needs to shut the fug up. Smitty's name needs to be filtered from the Huddle.  Smitty, blah blah blah...

 

So who is the one being emotional?

 

 

Just laugh at it and reminisce for old time's sake and chalk it up to Smitty being Smitty.  

 

As for week four, I hope that we can win fair and square and that no injuries are suffered during the game on either side.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Porn Shop Clerk Enthusiast

Porn Shop Clerk

Posted
Posted

Smitty needs to shut the fug up. Smitty's name needs to be filtered from the Huddle.  Smitty, blah blah blah...

 

So who is the one being emotional?

 

 

Just laugh at it and reminisce for old time's sake and chalk it up to Smitty being Smitty.  

 

As for week four, I hope that we can win fair and square and that no injuries are suffered during he game on either side.

 

who is a professional, and who is an anonymous fan posting on the internet?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SIGCHI222 Newbie

SIGCHI222

Posted
Posted

Obviously you did not bother to read the article.

BREAKING NEWS

 

SS#89 incapable of lying or embellishing.  All he says should be taken as dogma.

Pay no attention to what he says on the radio, live, with no filters or handlers.

 

CP I got no prob with you but I listen to WFNZ from 7:20 to 5:30 all day every day.  

 

I didn't disremember. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
iamhubby1 Veteran

iamhubby1

Posted
Posted

I hope RR puts Norman on him to start the game just to piss Smitty off.

 

 

Let him get ejected.

If anyone on our team can get under Smitty's skin, it would be Norman. lol

 

 

I agree with you that Marc James sucked ass... I'm a regular listener of WFNZ and I do not remember Steve saying these things. He said he desired to make the HOF. And I think he's already earned that personally but I'm biased. I remember him saying he wanted to play the slot... which implies having a successor. Link or I'm not buying it.

 

As far as grooming other receivers, his job never was to do that, it was to be a great receiver. Do you think anyone groomed Steve? Hell no. He earned everything he got. What knuckleheads did Marty Hurney draft worth grooming anyways?

Smitty has credited Ricky for helping to make him into a more complete WR. So...yup, Smitty has gotten groomed by someone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CelibatePimp Newbie

CelibatePimp

Posted
Posted

BREAKING NEWS

 

SS#89 incapable of lying or embellishing.  All he says should be taken as dogma.

Pay no attention to what he says on the radio, live, with no filters or handlers.

 

CP I got no prob with you but I listen to WFNZ from 7:20 to 5:30 all day every day.  

 

I didn't disremember. 

 

Again, it's a player's word against what you feel. Unless you have any evidence to suggest otherwise, why would I believe he was lying? The quotes are from an interview he gave to sports illustrated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...