Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Detroit prediction thread.....what you say?


Jmac

Recommended Posts

Seems Detroit's run-blocking is still questionable even they have duo talent at the RB position.

 

I think Star could have a field day.  TD will be a big factor on D for us as well against a team like the Lions.  

 

--

 

For our offense, Olsen/KB/Cotchery can work around that Detroit D but the OL against that line will be big.  

 

We just need to come out focused and discipline and can pull away the W by a TD or more.   

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lions O-line is actually good. We might have problems getting to Stafford consistently with 4 and might have to blitz. Key is containing Megatron.

 

As for our offense, Lions have speed rushers and that's where Bell struggles. RT will be tested too. Hope Cam is ready to use his legs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's going to be a good test for us. QB has a strong arm and works the middle of the field well against the zone. Good Oline. D line is nasty in pass rush. Ziggy is looking like he found the next level. And the linebackers are fast on the perimeter. They match up very well against us.

All around a great test. If we dominate this team our immediate future looks very bright. I'm betting it comes down to how sharp Cam looks in his season debut.

Sent from my HTCONE using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP
    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
×
×
  • Create New...