GB @ SEA (Scouting these two teams)

[run1stdownrun2nddown]

He didn't even look to the right side of the field. Sure Sherman is there, but that's a horrible excuse for "the best qb in the nfl". He under threw and over threw all day.

 

Only trying to help you understand more about football here. Think about that logically for a second. Lots of teams game plan not to throw the ball at Sherman. You see that and think Rodgers is playing bad, yes, but in reality it likely is from the coach's game plan.

[Paa Langfart]

Our defense is more than capable of completely making Lynch a non factor

 

 

If Lynch makes it past our LB corps we are screwed.

[CarolinaCoolin]

You don't make sense at all. The Seattle doesn't contain Cam and Kaepernick like it does other QBs. Stop feeling so threatened by the QBs I listed.

This isn't just the first post and I'm not specifically talking about how Seattle deals with certain qbs. They beat everyone.

Just your post ranging on qbs from Rodgers to cousins to manziel

Vs qbs who aren't that good that you talk like they are the second coming. Rg3 and kaep. Which is funny as poo

Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

[Mol3m4n]

Only trying to help you understand more about football here. Think about that logically for a second. Lots of teams game plan not to throw the ball at Sherman. You see that and think Rodgers is playing bad, yes, but in reality it likely is from the coach's game plan.

I call it bad play when he consistently under and over throws his receivers.

[Davidson Deac II]

You pay too much attention to stat padding, throwing the football in the air endlessly. That's the offense GB run. The games we played against seattle were blood bath that came down to the last possession.

 

If Cam couldn't throw on the right side where Sherman is, he would run through it.

 

I pay attention to results and points on the board.  Cam played terrible against Seattle in two games and SF's quarterback was even worse in more games.  Nothing to be embarrassed about, since Seattle is the best defense in the league.  Only a handful of qb's have done well against Seattle in the last couple of years, and none of them are known for running.  Seattle is vulnerable to qb's who can find the open receivers quickly and get the ball out accurately and quickly.  And that's about it.

 

Cam couldn't throw or run much against Seattle. 

[CarolinaCoolin]

Why you mentioned QBs that are not even starters. Back ups. Manziel and Cousins suck and they'll always suck. As for Rodgers, even his hypeman Stephen A. said he was a coward for not attempting on pass on the right side.

Like I said, Cam and Kaep would run through the right side if he couldn't throw there.

Cousins is arguably the best qb on that team and multiple people have said that since both of them have been in WAS. Johnny will end the year a starter for the browns.

Rodgers is the best qb in the league right now. Bar none.

All kaep can do is run. He can't go past the first read without taking off.

Cam got shut down by SEA. That was he worst game has played in the regular season.

Like I said. There's a trend with you when it comes to white qbs vs black ones and I'm pointing out your bias that's all

Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

[run1stdownrun2nddown]

I call it bad play when he consistently under and over throws his receivers.

 

So do I, when it actually happens.

 

So over time as you watch more and more football, you will learn to watch the action that is going on around the field instead of just staring at the QB when the ball is snapped. Today would actually be a great time to start practicing!

[Mol3m4n]

So do I, when it actually happens.

So over time as you watch more and more football, you will learn to watch the action that is going on around the field instead of just staring at the QB when the ball is snapped. Today would actually be a great time to start practicing!

You assume I haven't played and watched football since I was a child. Go troll somewhere else.

[run1stdownrun2nddown]

You assume I haven't played and watched football since I was a child. Go troll somewhere else.

 

It's a given fact from the words and phrases you are using. Now you are just flat out lying.

[Mol3m4n]

This guy though. Disagree and he doesn't have a valid point and instead goes for personal attacks. :/ smh

[Davidson Deac II]

Go re-watch the game. Like I said, it was a low scoring game that came down to one possession. Rodgers wasn't not even in it. When Seattle face dual threat QBs the game slow down for both teams because of limited possessions. Dual threat QBs tend to maintain long grinding possessions. When Seattle face the 9ers and us, it's a spitting image of themselves. When they face those supposed high powered 50 attempt stat padding guys they feast.

 

Not saying Rodgers is not good but when receivers aren't breaking tackles turning those slants into 70 yard gains he's limited. Nothing personal, just the nature of the passing game. You take away the receivers the QB suck. Plain and simple. The first excuse McCarthy threw around was tackles weren't being broken. Meaning those 3 yard slant were being converted to 1st down. Don't worry buddy, I'm sure the receivers for GB will break some tackles next week and make Rodgers look good, you can get back to raving about him soon.

 

You make the mistake of thinking I am a fan of Rodgers.  I am not, don't really care about Rodgers one way or the other.  I think I have watched him play all of three games the past couple of years.  You wouldn't be able to find any post where I raved about him.  I was simply responding to your comment about dual threat qb's having a better chance for success against Seattle.

 

I don't need to rewatch any game.  The facts speak for themselves.  You said dual threat quarterbacks have better success against Seattle.  That is your opinion, and of course you are welcome to it.  But there is not a iota of fact to back up your opinion.  Yes our two games against Seattle were low scoring.  They were low scoring because their defense and ours are both very good.  Their offense did enough to win, ours did not.  I think Cam himself would admit that he didn't play very well against them.  Its not a slam on Cam, its just reality.  And whether Cam could run the ball to Sherman's side is irrelevant if it doesn't result in points.  And while Cam hasn't exactly lit up Seattle, Colin K's games against Seattle have been atrocious.  Last year, he had three times as many turnovers as td', barely completed 50% of his passes, and their one win against Seattle last year happened in a game in which CK didn't run much.    

 

Seattle's corners give them a tremendous advantage against a running qb, or for that matter against any qb.  They are able to cover the vast majority of receivers one on one for longer periods of time than the average corner.  That allows the rest of the defense to focus on containing other receivers and tight end's and running backs.  It also allows them a greater focus on the opponents running game, or when playing us or SF, on a running qb. 

[IGSaint]

I pay attention to results and points on the board.  Cam played terrible against Seattle in two games and SF's quarterback was even worse in more games.  Nothing to be embarrassed about, since Seattle is the best defense in the league.  Only a handful of qb's have done well against Seattle in the last couple of years, and none of them are known for running.  Seattle is vulnerable to qb's who can find the open receivers quickly and get the ball out accurately and quickly.  And that's about it.

 

Cam couldn't throw or run much against Seattle. 

 

Cam didn't play terrible against seattle last year. Cam was 16/25 125 yards 1td no ints. He wasn't great and was average but he wasn't terrible that game. 

[Davidson Deac II]

Cam didn't play terrible against seattle last year. Cam was 16/25 125 yards 1td no ints. He wasn't great and was average but he wasn't terrible that game. 

 

Perhaps terrible is a slight overstatement.  Definitely not average though, at least not for him.  He didn't have any turnovers, but from a production standpoint it was his worst game of the year.  

[run1stdownrun2nddown]

This guy though. Disagree and he doesn't have a valid point and instead goes for personal attacks. :/ smh

 

Quick review:

You post some non-thought out, off the cuff remark about Rodgers is bad because he didn’t look Sherman’s way.

 

Using logic and facts I show that what you stated is completely, 100% incorrect.

 

You ignore that and immediately move onto your next point (which is also incorrect), finishing off by calling me a troll.

 

You are also obviously lying to yourself as we both know you are somewhat new to football, and you are literally in complete self-denial just to try to win an internet argument. Lol.