Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

M.H Very interviews D.G on ESPN 730


Jmac

Recommended Posts

Quite ironic actually...the guy that left the franchise in a mess cap wise interviewing the guy trying to dig them out.Very cordial on both ends with general team discussion...like nothing ever happened.Wonder what D.G. was really thinking...something like "you little S.O.B i'd like to %_××_ your %%_%× ass".

Very interesting to say the least.

Disregard the VERY from the post title..

android thumb strikes again

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hurney really misjudged the runningback market and made some stupid trades. Just some god awful items on that cap sheet. But he also took Cam Newton, and got most of the other building blocks on this team. So . . . I'll call it a push.

No one else form that draft class is on our team

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one else form that draft class is on our team

True, but I would take Cam Newton over the haul we got over awesome drafts in 2007 or 2001. Hitting on a franchise quarterback is the most important thing you can do as GM. People miss on picks all the time after the first round anyway.

I think he was good at getting good pieces, but missed out on how to make them all fit. He couldn't fill in those mid round picks and bargain bin free agents the same way Gettleman seems to be able to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP
    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
×
×
  • Create New...