Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL :domestic violence first offense..6 games ...lifetime ban 2nd offense


Jmac

Recommended Posts

Not so sure that is true.

First...the verdict would not be until after the rules change.

Second....we are not really talking about the law here. The punishment by the league does not have to follow the law.

Yeah but the NFLPA lawyers would/should appeal that in court because the arbitration rules that they agreed to follow under the CBA just changed on the spot.

IMO, if I get a speeding ticket and the fine is $300 and then in between my violation date an my court date it goes up to a year in jail instead, I would argue that I would have been a lot less likely to commit the violation under those stricter penalties.

Again I understand it isn't a court of law, but lawyers would get it into an actual court of law quickly I would think.

Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah but the NFLPA lawyers would/should appeal that in court because the arbitration rules that they agreed to follow under the CBA just changed on the spot.

IMO, if I get a speeding ticket and the fine is $300 and then in between my violation date an my court date it goes up to a year in jail instead, I would argue that I would have been a lot less likely to commit the violation under those stricter penalties.

Again I understand it isn't a court of law, but lawyers would get it into an actual court of law quickly I would think.

Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

 

 

Hmmmm....good points. I can see both side of the argument though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now just waive that marijuana suspension to be like the old domestic violence suspensions were and we're right on track.  Warning for first offense for marijuana, 1 game 2nd, 2 games 3rd.  4th offense is a free bong and a trip to Jamaica.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP
    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
×
×
  • Create New...