Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL :domestic violence first offense..6 games ...lifetime ban 2nd offense


Jmac

Recommended Posts

Open season to grab an NFL player by the balls and tell him to pay up or else.

If I was in the NFL I would stay the hell away from all women until I retired. Abstinence is the only true deterrent.

*cue the simple minded fools that think this post means I accept DV in any way*

Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

Theres Always the hand

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This will just be a bargaining chip the owners will use I get hgh testing and an 18 game schedule.

Players will agree to it so long as contracts are guaranteed and they can continue to act like dumb shits with impunity.

Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hardy can't get six. You can't punish someone under new guidelines if the infraction pre-dated it.

Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

 

Not so sure that is true.

 

First...the verdict would not be until after the rules change.

 

Second....we are not really talking about the law here.  The punishment by the league does not have to follow the law.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hardy can't get six. You can't punish someone under new guidelines if the infraction pre-dated it.

Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

You're right and they shouldn't be able too but I'm sure Goodell is just dying to get the opportunity to fix this mess he's made and make an example out of someone. Hardy's case will most likely be his first crack.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hardy will have a tough time signing a huge contract if he gets a strike in a two strikes and you're out rule. People are going to be a little nervous if imagine to shell out the dollars to a guy that could be gone forever at any second. Even if they get all their money back.

Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP
    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
×
×
  • Create New...