Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL :domestic violence first offense..6 games ...lifetime ban 2nd offense


Jmac

Recommended Posts

Domestic violence isn't always a clear picture. In a he said, she said scenario a guy 9.9/10 loses. I've seen and heard some shady things coming from females. Hitting themselves or threatening calling the cops just in an argument knowing the guy would most likely go to jail. My uncle had a psycho girlfriend. She was crazy and jealous behind closed doors but played nice to everyone outside the home. He passed out from drinking and she ripped his sack open with her fingernails one night. She ran, called the Cops, not one mark on her, my uncle had his nuts dangling in a bloody mess, after he goes to have emergency surgery, he goes to jail, and had to take anger management classes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Domestic violence isn't always a clear picture. In a he said, she said scenario a guy 9.9/10 loses. I've seen and heard some shady things coming from females. Hitting themselves or threatening calling the cops just in an argument knowing the guy would most likely go to jail. My uncle had a psycho girlfriend. She was crazy and jealous behind closed doors but played nice to everyone outside the home. He passed out from drinking and she ripped his sack open with her fingernails one night. She ran, called the Cops, not one mark on her, my uncle had his nuts dangling in a bloody mess, after he goes to have emergency surgery, he goes to jail, and had to take anger management classes.

So at point did your uncle figure out she was psycho? Don't tell me if was when his nut sack was ripped open and there was never a clue up to that point. If you know you have a psycho girlfriend and you stay you kind of get what you deserve especially if this isnt the first stunt she pulls.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP
    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
×
×
  • Create New...