Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL :domestic violence first offense..6 games ...lifetime ban 2nd offense


Jmac

Recommended Posts

Per Adam Shefter. looks like the crap will be hitting the fan on this issue.So we keep all eyes on our situation here in the upcoming months.If the jury case is lost, then a six game vacation for you know who.Lifetime ban is serious stuff...no more knocking your fiancee out cold in elevators. Fiqured they would tighten up this punishment sooner then later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@RavensInsider: NFL owner Roger Goodell in letter to owners on Ray Rice suspension: 'I didn't get it right. We have to do better.'

@RavensInsider: Roger Goodell in letter to owners, increased discipline for domestic violence: six games for first offense, at least full season for second

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@AdamSchefter: So the Ray Rice Fallout continues with a new domestic violence policy. Six games for 1st offense, lifetime ban for 2nd.

@AdamSchefter: Key phrase in new domestic violence policy sent to NFL owners: "These disciplinary consequences apply to all NFL personnel." ALL personnel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Open season to grab an NFL player by the balls and tell him to pay up or else.

If I was in the NFL I would stay the hell away from all women until I retired. Abstinence is the only true deterrent.

*cue the simple minded fools that think this post means I accept DV in any way*

Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP
    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
×
×
  • Create New...