Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

For Those Concerned about Cotchery and Avant:


UpstatePanther

Recommended Posts

i'll just leave this here:

http://espn.go.com/blog/carolina-panthers/post/_/id/8289/cotchery-on-target-despite-lack-of-targets?ex_cid=espnapi_public

 

and i'll quote Mr. Newton:

 

 

Avant has one catch for 25 yards, but he's been targeted only twice. Cotchery has been targeted only three times. 

 

cant make plays if the QB wont target you. and from what i hear, they were catching pretty much everything Cam threw their way in training camp. people need to do the research and not react so quickly. Cotchery and Avant, while they've normally not been flashy, have always been amazing possession receivers. we certainly have our flash with Smoo (hell he may even be a feature receiver because it seems like he has speed too, and we already know he catches everything in sight). but we need strong, tall possession receivers to back up Smoo. Cotchery and Avant will keep the double teams off KB with their play. they dont need to be flashy. that's KB's job. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know you can't read into what most teams do in pre-season. That goes tenfold for the Panthers offense since we have drafted Cam.

We all know he looks nothing like his regular season form in those 4 games, and I swear they tell him to work on one aspect or do one thing and forget the rest and he does. I still think Benjamin will be his go to guy but Cam was really good at looking at all his options last year and I think they will continue. 

I think the rest of the NFL world is going to get a rude awakening with what the Panthers do to the Bucs here in a week and a half. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i'll just leave this here:

http://espn.go.com/blog/carolina-panthers/post/_/id/8289/cotchery-on-target-despite-lack-of-targets?ex_cid=espnapi_public

and i'll quote Mr. Newton:

cant make plays if the QB wont target you. and from what i hear, they were catching pretty much everything Cam threw their way in training camp. people need to do the research and not react so quickly. Cotchery and Avant, while they've normally not been flashy, have always been amazing possession receivers. we certainly have our flash with Smoo (hell he may even be a feature receiver because it seems like he has speed too, and we already know he catches everything in sight). but we need strong, tall possession receivers to back up Smoo. Cotchery and Avant will keep the double teams off KB with their play. they dont need to be flashy. that's KB's job.

I had points and questions to engage you with, but they have all been superseded by this: what the hell is "Smoo"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I could also make the argument that a QB can't target a receiver if the receiver is not open.  That being said, I do agree that it is to early to be concerned about the receivers.  In fact, I think that we could end up with a better group this year than we had last year, although it might take a few games for this to show. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cam's nickname for Kelvin Benjamin haha what are your questions?

Ok, awesome. Asked and answered.

I would agree that Avant has consistently produced for several years and should be a good 3 or 2, but Cotchery's track record has been more down than up the last couple seasons. And outside of him the depth is unproven. Don't you think some of the questions regarding our receivers are somewhat valid?

I am more hopeful that Olsen, Benjamin, and an improved running game being enough. I think everybody past Avant on the receiver depth chart is a low cost gamble, with little chance to break big (25+ receptions).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't you think some of the questions regarding our receivers are somewhat valid?

 

of course. i just think people are being too quick to say that Cotchery and Avant suck. there is no evidence that they do or will. and even if their production isnt what we'd like it to be, there is Cam and the OL to share blame as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

of course. i just think people are being too quick to say that Cotchery and Avant suck. there is no evidence that they do or will. and even if their production isnt what we'd like it to be, there is Cam and the OL to share blame as well.

Ok, I would agree with that. It is still too early, considering the time Cam missed, to say that we are set or screwed at receiver.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

.... Cotchery's track record has been more down than up the last couple seasons.

He had 10 TD's last season, on 46 receptions- best % in the league. Not bad for a WR at 31. He's a solid possession receiver, as is Avant. Both have proven they belong on the field.

 

It would have been nice if Cam could have spent a lot of time throwing to the vets who are new to the team, but as Rivera said, they needed to find out who's best to fill out the bottom spots on the WR corp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cotchery had 6 catches last preseason and had more TDs than all our WRs. He also had only 6 catches the preseason he had 82 catches. Enough said. Of course we will still have people post about how bad our receivers are before they even play a snap in the regular season.

Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just had Thanksgiving meal with a couple dozen family and friends. I lucked out and got one of the smoked turkey legs. Stuffing, mashed taters and gravy, green bean casserole, sweet potato casserole, kale, smoked ham, chicken and rice, corn, lima beans, cranberry sauce, and great people. My brother got his guitar out and we got to singing. Lots of actual conversations with people I hardly  ever get to see, haven't seen in a while, or who I never met before. Just a great moment to remember.
    • 3-8 would be a higher win percentage than 3-9
    • Same... With the personnel the Niners had, that defense could have been historically good in the right hands. Under Wilks they were certainly good, they didn't quite rise to that level. Honestly, I see Wilks kinda like I see Rivera: fantastic person, decent head coach. Skill wise, phenomenal DB coach, so-so DC. His greatest strength is his leadership. Hard to find many better in that department. In the Xs and Os / execution area though, not as good. Bottom Line: Wilks is the sort of coach that needs a staff that excels in those aspects of the game where he's weaker. But, like Rivera, I don't know that he scouts assistants very well. That as much as anything might be why he's not in the NFL now.
×
×
  • Create New...