Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If Hardy's conviction isn't overturned, he might not play for awhile


jtnc

Recommended Posts

Again where is your expertise or any special knowledge here.  If you are going to call someone ignorant you ought to have special education or standing  to back up your comments.  You can disagree for sure but if you are going to post like some kind of expert at least have the credentials to back it up.  Particularly when you don't have a clue what you are talking about.

Unfortunately, while not a lawyer, I deal with legal matters every day and have two lawyers on speed dial. Spoke with them boththis week. I've learned a lot.

 

This type of legal matter is basic first year law stuff that every lawyer knows. This is not specialist issues.

 

If I really cared I could get free legal advice and prove you wrong but your aggressive ignorance has grown tiresome. 

 

I'll just assume somehow you know more about this than me and move along.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope so but remember people are pretty upset about Ray Rice just receiving a 2 game ban.

Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

I think that was because the abuse was so obvious and was recorded on TV and played endlessly.  I don't know that the facts in the Hardy case were so one-sided or so obvious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unfortunately, while not a lawyer, I deal with legal matters every day and have two lawyers on speed dial. Spoke with them boththis week. I've learned a lot.

 

This type of legal matter is basic first year law stuff that every lawyer knows. This is not specialist issues.

 

If I really cared I could get free legal advice and prove you wrong but your aggressive ignorance has grown tiresome. 

 

I'll just assume somehow you know more about this than me and move along.

Having a lawyer on speed dial hardly qualifies as anything.  I talk with psychiatrists every day, do you think that means I know enough to prescribe medicine.  Any lawyer worth his salt would tell you that unless you specialize in a field you shouldn't practice in areas for which you don;t have specialized training.  And the fact that you think that any lawyer knows the rules about  employment law, franchise law and antitrust law which all apply here shows that you know enough to be dangerous because you think you know  a lot more than you do.

If you didn't go to law school then how would you know what was taught.

 

While you are getting free law advice how about getting some pointers on how not to be a dick.. 

 

 

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having a lawyer on speed dial hardly qualifies as anything.  I talk with psychiatrists every day, do you think that means I know enough to prescribe medicine.  Any lawyer worth his salt would tell you that unless you specialize in a field you shouldn't practice in areas for which you don;t have specialized training.  And the fact that you think that any lawyer knows the rules about  employment law, franchise law and antitrust law which all apply here shows that you know enough to be dangerous because you think you know  a lot more than you do.

If you didn't go to law school then how would you know what was taught.

 

While you are getting free law advice how about getting some pointers on how not to be a dick.. 

 

 

.

Aw you called me a dick :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wrong once again.  Read what I said and I never mentioned you were a dick simply that you could get advice on how not to be one.  Clearly not the same and if you knew the law like you say you do, you would know that..

At least take credit for your childish insults.

 

And I do know the law. It is funny that you post the most inaccurate basic and bizarre legal assumptions on the law yet I need a specialist law degree to prove you wrong. What is your legal background exactly?

 

I also am not an accountant but having worked in an accounting firm for a decade I can easily walk you through a financial statement. The layperson can't. Same deal

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So hey, you're a dope for saying that. Just thought I would stop in and let you know you said something really dumb. You should try not to do that in the future because then people will think you're dumb.

 

I say the more you can hurt a player for smacking women around, do it. Maybe, just maybe, a player will think twice about that before going all Scarface on his significant other. I don't care if it hurts Greg Hardy. Because the two words already hurt Greg Hardy in the court of public opinion and the real court of law: FOUND GUILTY

 

If the only way you can reach these idiots is by taking game checks and playing time then by all means use that method. This is more cowardly than using PEDs and more intolerable than recreational drugs. It should be reflected in the league's reaction.

 

You got any women in your life you care about? Put her into this situation hypothetically and read your own post again.

 

I actually tried what you said but I don't have any women in my life I care about that are gold-digging coke-heads who completely fabricate a story to try to take someone else's money. Kind of hard to put them in that situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At least take credit for your childish insults.

 

And I do know the law. It is funny that you post the most inaccurate basic and bizarre legal assumptions on the law yet I need a specialist law degree to prove you wrong. What is your legal background exactly?

 

I also am not an accountant but having worked in an accounting firm for a decade I can easily walk you through a financial statement. The layperson can't. Same deal

I don't claim any expertise in the law and am not foolish enough like you to spout off my opinion without having discussed this with someone who is an expert. I had this conversation with my brother who is a franchise/ employment attorney for a nationally known firm who deals with these kind of cases all the time and his explanation suggests you have no clue and aren't even addressing the germaine issues.

 

On the other hand , I just erased a few paragraphs where I pointed out where you were off base because it is a huge waste of time.  You turned this into a pissing contest from the start and I don't debate for the purpose of amusing other watching us insult each other. Plus you have your mind made up so why even debate??

 

They say ignorance is bliss and by your board name you seem well on your way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...