Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So a fun question for the Huddle.


Brothergrim427

Recommended Posts

Besides he owes his success to mister Earl Thomas III that's the real star in that secondary not to mention chancellor

 

They make each other better. All three do. Kam and Earl's job is made easier by Sherman taking away half the field, Sherman's job is easier because he knows IF he get's beaten (and I mean truly beaten) Earl or Kam will likely be able to make up the ground to help over the top. Kam's job easier knowing he can play in the box, or roam free because Earl can cover so much ground and Sherman is shutting down his half of the field because his side of the field is the last place most Quarterbacks want to throw the ball the majority of the time. 

 

Sorry, but Sherman is an elite Corner. To say otherwise is asinine. That's taking nothing away from Kam or Earl Thomas though. All three are in the elite of the elite at their respective positions. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They make each other better. All three do. Kam and Earl's job is made easier by Sherman taking away half the field, Sherman's job is easier because he knows IF he get's beaten (and I mean truly beaten) Earl or Kam will likely be able to make up the ground to help over the top. Kam's job easier knowing he can play in the box, or roam free because Earl can cover so much ground and Sherman is shutting down his half of the field because his side of the field is the last place most Quarterbacks want to throw the ball the majority of the time.

Sorry, but Sherman is an elite Corner. To say otherwise is asinine. That's taking nothing away from Kam or Earl Thomas though. All three are in the elite of the elite at their respective positions.

I don't dispute he is good ? I said Thomas is better which is hard to dispute, also my only issue with him is his trash talk so why the stern defense ? And again WTF is swagger I hate to nag but my friends say it and I'd like to know
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't dispute he is good ? I said Thomas is better which is hard to dispute, also my only issue with him is his trash talk so why the stern defense ? And again WTF is swagger I hate to nag but my friends say it and I'd like to know

 

You root for a Cam Newton led team and you don't know what swagger is? 

 

What is the problem with trash talk? I bet you cheered your ass off for Steve Smith his entire career....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You root for a Cam Newton led team and you don't know what swagger is?

What is the problem with trash talk? I bet you cheered your ass off for Steve Smith his entire career....

I like that smith was tough for a guy my height but his mouth always disappointed me , he taught me that you could be little and still win if you work hard enough, but he also unlike me was a dick about it I've always been taught that being humble and respectful of your peers is incredibly important. and yes I Am a huge fan of cam and have no idea what that means
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like that smith was tough for a guy my height but his mouth always disappointed me he taught me that u could be little and still win if u work hard enough but he also unlike me was a dick about it and yes I Am a huge fan of cam and have no idea what that means

 

So basically you want players to say "gee golly whillickers that was a terrible route" while on the field. Sorry, I'll take a guy who uses every advantage both physical and cerebral. Just like 89.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So basically you want players to say "gee golly whillickers that was a terrible route" while on the field. Sorry, I'll take a guy who uses every advantage both physical and cerebral. Just like 89.

How is that cerebral ? It's just rude and makes you look like a bad person ? Where's the morals ? The standards and sportsmanship ? Why not win and use your success to inspire others not spend your time looking like a dude with small dick syndrome ? Does every good player need a Napoleon complex ?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I define Classy play as Payton Manning, or those like him that play well and are quiet and respectful of their opponent.

If everyone was quiet and respectful of their opponent there would be no such thing as rivalries and the league would be extremely boring. Everyone loves the classy players like Peyton, Jeter, and Durant, but we would be fooling ourselves if sports only included that type of personality. We need villains. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If everyone was quiet and respectful of their opponent there would be no such thing as rivalries and the league would be extremely boring. Everyone loves the classy players like Peyton, Jeter, and Durant, but we would be fooling ourselves if sports only included that type of personality. We need villains.

That at least is a semi reasonable point my only thing is I'd rather not have villains in Carolina
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If everyone was quiet and respectful of their opponent there would be no such thing as rivalries and the league would be extremely boring. Everyone loves the classy players like Peyton, Jeter, and Durant, but we would be fooling ourselves if sports only included that type of personality. We need villains. 

 

Bingo, and honestly if a "villain" can get into an opponents head and help the Panthers win a ring I'll take a "villain" any day...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...