Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Our schedule is HORRIBLE


CoastalCat

Recommended Posts

While we're on the subject, I understand the schedule rotation, and how we have placers each year with the teams that finish the same as us, but how is the home/away picked? We've randomly played Seattle at home 3 years in a row. I would think that in 2012 and 2014(where we were playing based on standings rather than playing the entire NFC West) that we would have swapped this year and played away.

 

Once was because we played the NFC West that year and twice was because we were same place finishers. 

 

Edit: also home and away is alternated each time we play a whole Division. So next time we match up against the West we will travel to Seattle. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Out of the 5 easiest schedules last year, 4 made the playoffs.

 

 

With the exception of the two games against NFC same place finishers. 

 

In addition....the home/road opponents are also predetermined and not based on record. 

 

If you google the right thing people have dones statistical analyses on the correlation between SoS and wins. And there isn't any. Good teams win and bad teams lose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry....I thought it would also be obvious that when you're rotating between three other Divisions that one would be repeated every other year like the West was in 2012 and 2014.

 

They are repeated every 3 years. We played the NFC West in 2013, 2010, and 2007.

 

2012 and 2014, on the other hand, are placer games. I'm wondering why we hosted both of those.

 

Does anyone else understand what I'm asking?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are repeated every 3 years. We played the NFC West in 2013, 2010, and 2007.

 

2012 and 2014, on the other hand, are placer games. I'm wondering why we hosted both of those.

 

That's what I was answering.....you have three other Divisions to split up between two other teams. That means it isn't a perfect rotation home/away. So sometimes we end up playing a Division same place finisher at home again before playing them on the road. It happens again with the NFC East in 2017 and 2019

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone know the answer though? Why have we hosted Seattle in both 2012 and 2014?

Yes. 

 

In 2012 we played the Seahawks because we both finished 3rd in our division in 2011 and that was a scheduled home game (our away game was third in the NFC North).

 

There are two games each year which matches a team against an opponent that finished in the same place in another division. this is in addition to playing all the teams in another NFC division and AFC division

 

In 2014 we (for some reason) got the NFC west again as our home matchup and we both finished first last year so there you go.

 

No idea why the NFL gave us NFC west at home again.

 

We can't host the seahawks again until 2019 UNLESS we finish in the same place in the division in 2017 in which case we will host them in 2018

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes. 

 

In 2012 we played the Seahawks because we both finished 3rd in our division in 2011 and that was a scheduled home game (our away game was third in the NFC North).

 

There are two games each year which matches a team against an opponent that finished in the same place in another division. this is in addition to playing all the teams in another NFC division and AFC division

 

In 2014 we (for some reason) got the NFC west again as our home matchup and we both finished first last year so there you go.

 

No idea why the NFL gave us NFC west at home again.

 

We can't host the seahawks again until 2019 UNLESS we finish in the same place in the division in 2017 in which case we will host them in 2018

 

I'm on board with how the standings-based games are selected, just not the home/away on those. You lost me on the last part. So we're scheduled to play the NFC West again in 2016(Seattle Away), and 2019(Seattle home). Why can't we host them again before 2017, even if we finish the same?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'd give it a C mainly because of Brooks.  If we just didn't have a 2nd I'd argue B to B+ tbh. Brooks was a bad gamble, tho one that could still pay off long term. Yes XL only has 400 yards but... Look who is throwing him the ball. And I think he isn't a "true #1" but he's been able to consistently get open. Hands definitely need to be cleaned up.  But he should end the year with 500-600 yards. Like you said - Sanders looks great.  Get him a better QB / more time with a QB and I think he's gonna impress. We added a couple rotational players on D that have both made plays and show promise for the future from later rounds. So I'd say, Brooks really hurts this drafts grade. It'll be interesting to see how it progresses over the next 3 years. I've overall really liked Morgan's FA acquisitions, so...
    • Oh he would absolutely flourish. It’s the panthers way. It’s no different with coaches. Sometimes they reach their expiration date, go somewhere else, and find new success.  Similarly to Burns, how long to wait for the light to finally turn on?  Market forces will demand a salary that the panthers can not responsibly match. Sliding him to guard will fit his skill set better, but he has played LT for 3 years. He will receive offers from other teams wanting to pay him LT money.  At guard, he won’t start with what they have paid Hunt and Lewis. Center then?? Dunno. Maybe? He will become a backup by default once they draft their stud LT. I doubt Dan just stands pat. That’s not his MO.  So where does this put him? Can you match what other teams will offer for a backup LT/guard? Do you dish out franchise LT $ on a guy who still needs significant improvement in pass protection. This team will be DOA in the playoffs with the very first team who has a formidable speed rusher. What if he has hit his ceiling in pass protection already and they sign him long term? It’s a big gamble either way. 
    • We're in a great position to see just how big of a misstep it would be, having made so many ourselves
×
×
  • Create New...