Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Pats claim RB Tyler Gaffney off waivers

UNCrules2187

By UNCrules2187,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Paintballr Newbie

Paintballr

Posted
Posted

So basically we waived/injured him to save some cap space and then re-sign him once he cleared waivers and then put him on IR.

And then Pats Pat'd

Why would Dave risk this happening for cap space? At this point we should have enough to sign someone if a starter gets hurt, we arent over or anything, why risk it?

Sent from my SCH-I535 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites
UNCrules2187 Mentor

UNCrules2187

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Repost for those who are on mobile and cant see tweets?

Sent from my SCH-I535 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

 

Adam Schefter @AdamSchefter
Patriots claimed former Panthers rookie RB Tyler Gaffney on waivers today after Carolina tried to sneak him through waivers and into IR.
 
Jonathan Jones ‏@jjones9 
By rule, the Panthers had to waive the injured Gaffney. They were going to sign him back and place him on IR. Patriots have foiled that
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Paintballr Newbie

Paintballr

Posted
Posted

Adam Schefter @AdamSchefter

Patriots claimed former Panthers rookie RB Tyler Gaffney on waivers today after Carolina tried to sneak him through waivers and into IR.

Jonathan Jones ‏@jjones9

By rule, the Panthers had to waive the injured Gaffney. They were going to sign him back and place him on IR. Patriots have foiled that

Why couldn't they just IR him?

Sent from my SCH-I535 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites
UNCrules2187 Mentor

UNCrules2187

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Panthers could have kept Gaffney, but would have meant sitting on him until cuts were due and IR then. But they needed Fozzy Whittaker now.

— Darin Gantt (@daringantt)

July 28, 2014

 

Basically, the Panthers bet $100k and a draft pick that everybody would play nice. They lost.

— Darin Gantt (@daringantt)

July 28, 2014

 

Darin Gantt @daringantt
Panthers could have kept Gaffney, but would have meant sitting on him until cuts were due and IR then. But they needed Fozzy Whittaker now.
 
Darin Gantt ‏@daringantt 
Basically, the Panthers bet $100k and a draft pick that everybody would play nice. They lost.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...