Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Noah and PJ to have limited roles.


SuperJTheGreat

Recommended Posts

I think Vonleh needs to get 26+ minutes a game

Sent from my SM-G900T using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

That's borderline starter minutes. No way. His game is way too raw and he'd be an offensive and defensive liability at this point starting for us
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Vonleh needs to get 26+ minutes a game

Sent from my SM-G900T using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

 

Are you kidding me?  I hope you are being sarcastic.

 

nevermind....I forgot that you were only a 15 yo kid.

 

 

vonleh is not even close to contributing this year.  He is young, raw, and does not have an NBA body or game yet.

 

PJ is the one that could have minimal minutes but have a scoring impact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's the one thing I don't care for about Clifford. I love the man outside of that. But, this strategy goes horribly wrong when you have a rookie/young guy completely outplaying the vet in front of him and yet, he still gets no mins.

I know he's explained it before about how if you play a young guy too early it can destroy their development. BUT, there is a very thin line there that you could end up hurting them if you don't play them enough either...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this isnt the old Bobcats teams that are still looking to build a team.. we are trying to win games now and make the playoffs and contender for the Eastern Conference title.. leave the rookies on the bench and let the vets- who you know will produce- get the minutes and get the Ws

 

let the rookies come in 3rd string and garbage time

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If PJ comes in and starts lighting it up, Clifford might extend his PT in that game, but not consistently.  Everyone was frustrated last season when they wanted more Zeller and less McRoberts, be ready for more of the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • be kind of hard with us going undefeated the rest of the year. yeah...i said it.
    • I don't think it's necessarily selfless to make that trade. I think it's all in how you plan and if you can objectively view the player. You know you're going to have a new coach and be taking a QB in the draft. Whether or not he wanted to admit it, we were going to be beginning a rebuild with a new offense and new defense. Depending on the coach, Burns may not have even been a good fit for the scheme that coach wanted to run.  So, if you're not 1st, you're going to need to trade up. Burns likely is going to want in the 30m per year range. While an effective pass rusher, he was never a complete DE. He wasn't a JJ, TJ, Bosa, or Garrett. He was more Reddick, and while good, never going to be in that top tier contract caliber.  So the question becomes, knowing that you need a QB to go with a new coach, is it better to have your  23, 24 and 25' 1sts  extra 24 and 25 1sts an extra 23'2nd  and 30m aav of future contract cap space to get a QB and edge rusher  Or your 23, 24 and 25 1sts and a good, but not elite DE on an elite tier contract.  6 picks and available 30m AAV in cap space vs 3 picks and 0 extra cap space to get a QB and a good, not great, DE.  To me that is a simple answer and frankly one that could potentially save my job. You have to have vision and be able to recognize value. Fitts over valued Burns like many fans did. I think ultimately what cost him his job was 3 years of not being able to value players correctly. We saw it twice in the draft in 2 separate years when he panicked and couldn't read the draft. DJ Johnson and Matt Corral picks specifically come to mind.  I don't think it was about being selfless as much as being a strategist. Neither Rhule nor Fitts never struck me as very strategic guys. I think they were more let's throw poo at the wall and see what sticks. Unfortunately for the fans, none of it stuck, but it still all stunk. 
    • The issue is the formula is secret, and it incorporates runs... So... Yup, it does. Same with PFF (which isn't quite as secret). But when it doesn't - like on Sunday - it's often to hilarious results. PFF is more reliable I think at matching my 'eye' test.
×
×
  • Create New...