-
Welcome!
Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!
Or simply create a new Huddle account.
Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!
-
-
-
-
Topics
-
-
-
-
Posts
-
Then in regards to your continued refusal to separate Evans' career numbers, which are more due to long term health than sustained elite play, from who he was as an actual player at any given moment.... As I said the other night, I'll give you Evans' elite TD production, but also as I said, that's where T-Mac would be most likely to replicate Evan's NFL game, considering how great of a redzone weapon he's going to be. Even if he doesn't become a huge yardage guy, he's going to score a poo ton of TD's with his size and hands. But you really need to stop talking about Evans' 12,000 career yards as some proof of him being an actual elite WR on the field of play and not when looking at an overall career statistical output. Evans' 3rd best yardage season out of 11 seasons was 1,255 in 17 games. His 3rd best reception season was 79 catches, he's never had a single 100 catch season (his best was 96). He was never a 1st team All Pro and was only a 2nd team AP twice, which means 9 of his 11 seasons, voters didn't ever have him as a Top 3 WR and was only even Top 6 twice. It's not a knock on Evans, he's a HOFer, but he will get into Canton because of his long term sustained great play, not because he was ever a true elite WR for more than maybe 1 or 2 season's of his entire career. Mike Evans is the Frank Gore of WRs As I said the other night, saying X player will be better than Y player, isn't saying X player will have a better career than Y player. The only thing you can predict with long term health and availability is in the negative, you can predict someone will struggle with it if they already have (which T-Mac hasn't). But trying to predict who will be able to play for 10+ years without ever getting hurt vs someone who is going to be truly elite for half the time but not the other due to injury, is a literal crap shoot that isn't predictable. Hence me saying T-Mac will be better than Evans is me saying in a vacuum he'll be a better player, but if he'll have a better career it will come down to how long he's able to sustain being a better player than Evans, which is unpredictable for any player at any position in any league. If you view Evans as being a legit true elite WR outside of maybe 2 seasons, then that's the hangup, and really, it's on you, because again, 2nd team all pro twice, never first, hard to argue against that even before you dig into the numbers themselves, which don't support your argument either. 5 of Evans' 11 seasons have been between 1,001 and 1,051 yards. If each of those 5 seasons ends up at 999 or less yards, there is a very different narrative on Evans, in that he was a true elite red zone weapon, but only a pretty good WR outside of that. The 11 years of 1k narrative is HUGE to what his legacy is, it's undeniable. -
Just in terms of comparing them as prospects.... I'm not going to try and pretend I remember Evans' draft profile from a dozen years ago, so just looking at stats after you remove T-Mac's Freshman year, where he still had 700 yards and 8 TDs (and only because Evans redshirted and then only played 2 years in college). Evans - 151 catches for 2,499 yards, and 17 TDs T-Mac - 174 catches for 2,721 yards and 18 TDs So I'm not sure how you can say definitively Evans was a better prospect than T-Mac is, especially when Evans wasn't a speedster anyways (ran a 4.53), which is really the only knock people have on T-Mac, and then T-Mac had better stats across the board.
-
By Aussie Tank · Posted
Nah it's pretty embarrassing that your calling him a better receiving talent than Mike Evans when he's not even a better draft prospect. Let alone the 100 touchdowns and 12000 odd yards
-
-
(1).thumb.jpg.39d47488da35eba0b4aca548ded58784.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.