Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How Hornets matchup against Top Teams in East


bLACKpANTHER

Recommended Posts

Maybe, but I think a point guard's stats tend to be skewed if you want to use PER as your base for measuring the defense of one player.

IE if the rest of the Cavs defenders are terrible, then the opposing point guard might rack up easy assists.

you gone have to go.  your PER stat don't ring true for kemba. therefore it is skewed towards points.  don't believe me then ask this cam/superman character. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the league average is 15... and players averages over an 18.0 PER when going against Irving. That's got to be worrisome.

Use net per.

Player Per- opposing per= net.

Kryie' net is 1.94

Kemba's net is 1.1

A difference of .84 a game.

The difference between the two is slight with stats.

Dragic's opp per is 12 and he has no one behind him to protect the rim.

Sent from my iPad using CarolinaHuddle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe, but I think a point guard's stats tend to be skewed if you want to use PER as your base for measuring the defense of one player.

IE if the rest of the Cavs defenders are terrible, then the opposing point guard might rack up easy assists.

With Irving on the floor, the Cavs have allowed 106.3 points per 100 possessions. Stretched out across the season, that would be the league's fifth-worst defensive rating. When Irving takes a seat, that number drops all the way to 99.5. Only the Indiana Pacers, Chicago Bulls and Oklahoma City Thunder have a better defensive rating than the Irving-less Cavs.

Now, on/off splits can be skewed by the other players on the floor. But with players like C.J. Miles and Anderson Varejao, both of whom share the starting lineup with Irving, the Cavs get worse when those two leave the floor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dunleavy shot 43%.... which is pretty a average while MKG shot a respectable 47%....

Dunleavy is also a terrible defensive player while MKG is an elite defender

I wonder how many of Dunleavy's shots came from outside of 15 ft compared to MKG's shots.   MKG's field goal percentage if skewed.  Most of his buckets are coming from either transition or putbacks.  Dunleavy's percentage includes a much larger shot radius.

 

Personally I think Dunleavy is better offensively and MKG is better defensively and has better potential.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please nobody feed this Greg Hardy AK47 troll. So obvious that he is a complete loser who considers trolling a Hornets sub-forum as good use of his entire Friday night.

Oh and anyone who is really drunk and then wastes his buzz on the Internet to talk marginal sports opinion on a Friday night is officially a social pariah.

Sent from my SCH-I545 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You could go with Hollinger's PER that had Kyrie 6th and Kemba 17th. I'm all about Kemba, but he's not better than Kyrie. Maybe healthier but not better.

17th is about right. I felt like he was right about average for nba starters last season. I think his ceiling is right at top ten.

The comparison with Kyrie Irving should be used to show that Kyrie is overrated, not that kemba is underrated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kemba/Lance/MKG

I don't think people realize the intangibles that trio is going to bring to the team. Kemba & MKG are both champions & great leaders. All 3 of them are incredibly competitive & willing to do all the little things to get a W.

With their leadership, competitiveness, & champion pedigree that core has MJ written all over it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Add for Kyrie vs Kemba...

Their stats are nearly identical...

Kemba has lured an All-Star talent to CLT 2 straight summers. He pretty much singlehandedly recruited Big Al here. Then today Stephenson talked about how playing with Kemba was a huge part of his decision.

Other players around the league realize how talented Kemba is & his leadership/competitiveness. It says a lot that players want to come here & play with him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh noes, Kemba sucks!

I take Kemba ten out of ten times. People on this board under-rate the man.

Sent from my HTC6525LVW using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

If Kemba was at least 6'2, I'd agree with you. His height will keep him underrated. If he's 6'0, then Mugsy is 5'11.

Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Kemba was at least 6'2, I'd agree with you. His height will keep him underrated. If he's 6'0, then Mugsy is 5'11.

Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

Kemba is a legit 6' tall. I met Kemba in 2012 and he was the same height as me. And I measured 6' 9/16" when I had my last physical.

His height isn't really an issue, though. He can finish drives better than guys much taller than him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Love Kemba, great fit here and happy to have him. However, he is not on level with Kyrie.

Take MKG and Hendo out of lineup, Kemba gets exposed on defense. Kyrie is young and and has not played with talent that Kemba has. Kyrie was his teams first option, yet shot better percentages than Kemba did, and Kemba had help.

Kyrie is the better player, but I like the fit with Kemba here

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • be kind of hard with us going undefeated the rest of the year. yeah...i said it.
    • I don't think it's necessarily selfless to make that trade. I think it's all in how you plan and if you can objectively view the player. You know you're going to have a new coach and be taking a QB in the draft. Whether or not he wanted to admit it, we were going to be beginning a rebuild with a new offense and new defense. Depending on the coach, Burns may not have even been a good fit for the scheme that coach wanted to run.  So, if you're not 1st, you're going to need to trade up. Burns likely is going to want in the 30m per year range. While an effective pass rusher, he was never a complete DE. He wasn't a JJ, TJ, Bosa, or Garrett. He was more Reddick, and while good, never going to be in that top tier contract caliber.  So the question becomes, knowing that you need a QB to go with a new coach, is it better to have your  23, 24 and 25' 1sts  extra 24 and 25 1sts an extra 23'2nd  and 30m aav of future contract cap space to get a QB and edge rusher  Or your 23, 24 and 25 1sts and a good, but not elite DE on an elite tier contract.  6 picks and available 30m AAV in cap space vs 3 picks and 0 extra cap space to get a QB and a good, not great, DE.  To me that is a simple answer and frankly one that could potentially save my job. You have to have vision and be able to recognize value. Fitts over valued Burns like many fans did. I think ultimately what cost him his job was 3 years of not being able to value players correctly. We saw it twice in the draft in 2 separate years when he panicked and couldn't read the draft. DJ Johnson and Matt Corral picks specifically come to mind.  I don't think it was about being selfless as much as being a strategist. Neither Rhule nor Fitts never struck me as very strategic guys. I think they were more let's throw poo at the wall and see what sticks. Unfortunately for the fans, none of it stuck, but it still all stunk. 
    • The issue is the formula is secret, and it incorporates runs... So... Yup, it does. Same with PFF (which isn't quite as secret). But when it doesn't - like on Sunday - it's often to hilarious results. PFF is more reliable I think at matching my 'eye' test.
×
×
  • Create New...