Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Boozer?


Recommended Posts

If we could get Boozer for 4-5 mil as I saw being discussed then I think we should do it. I would rather see him play at the 4 for us than Marvin. Only problem is as others have discussed is 7 mil for a bench player is kind of hefty and I would rather start MKG than Marvin. If were not getting Lance (and it doesn't look promising right now), I would still say sign him anyways. It would be a cheap signing for a vet like boozer, upgrade our PF position, and at the worst just have a pricey, but very reliable back up in Marvin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So without Boozer last yr we were the 7th seed but very close to the 5th so now with everybody back and older minus Roberts but plus draft picks and hypothetically Boozer, we are in a worse position and no hope for the future?

Lots of teams behind us got better. We are going sideways at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we ship out Neal, we can probably afford to sign Boozer and Stephenson.

 

Kemba, Roberts

Stephenson, Hendo, PJ

MKG, Williams, PJ

Zeller, Boozer, Vonleh

Jefferson, Vonleh, Biz

 

I'd bring Boozer off the bench since he and Al aren't the best defenders.

 

But that's a team where everyone has an opportunity for minutes. Could create nice competition. And it gives us fresher legs come playoff time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lots of teams behind us got better. We are going sideways at this point.

 

We tried to get Hayward by overpaying and for whatever reason we aren't going after Lance bc we have the money to but aren't so what would your suggestion be for improving this team? 

 

I understand the view of going sideways but isnt it better sometimes to go sideways and avoid making a huge mistake. We still have a young team that will be improving sometimes you need that veteran influence to make a step forward even if the "core" is the same. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everybody complaining about paying Marvin $7mil....

Where are your proposals for spending that money? Our roster is almost full & we still have a ton of money to spend just to hit the salary cap floor. The money has to be spent somewhere.

We're one near minimum signing away from the floor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We tried to get Hayward by overpaying and for whatever reason we aren't going after Lance bc we have the money to but aren't so what would your suggestion be for improving this team? 

 

I understand the view of going sideways but isnt it better sometimes to go sideways and avoid making a huge mistake. We still have a young team that will be improving sometimes you need that veteran influence to make a step forward even if the "core" is the same. 

 

Slow down. I'm OK with essentially staying pat if improving marginally means sacrificing the future (like overpaying for GH, which we tried to do).  

 

My bitch with the moves made this offseason is that we way overpaid for MW (especially in view of guys like Boozer being available) and we should have addressed PG in the draft.  Kemba may or may not be the answer and we need backup plans there.  

 

So far this offseason, we have let a good player go (McBob), replaced him with someone that is maybe a push, brought in a thug player that has been nothing but bad news and MAY have jeopardized our ability to go after LS since two bad guys at the 2 spot might be a bit much, and offered an absolutely silly contract for a player that's very good, but not max value good.  And LS is the one guy that clearly improves this team and could be had cheaper than GH, but we haven't pursued that.  

 

And I'm not sure where this veteran influence mantra comes from.  The team has Big Al, Gary Neal, and even Hendo at this point as vets.  The team is still the youngest at PG with no mentorship (read competition) in place--- more PFs aren't needed.  

 

And if MW is your veteran influence, we are talking about a good guy, but one that has way underachieved his entire career.  Is that the type of mentorship we want?

 

Basically, at this point, the Hornets either need to make a big splash and try to move into the top 4 in the East, or they need to bandaid together some 1 year deals for vets that can keep them in the 6-8 seed until a real name becomes available via trade or FA. Boozer at a 1 year amnestied deal would actually fit that bill perfectly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What are you talking about? Marvin played 66 games last season, and mostly at SF. He was also better than Luol Deng last season.

Williams/Boozer would be solid at the 3/4 but it buries our two most important pieces (MKG/Vonleh) on the bench. Wasn't the point of blowing up our first playoff team to get rid of overpaid veterans and rebuild with young players?

I don't get this team.

The only "bad" contract on the roster is Henderson, and in this SG market that 6 million looks better and better. Marvin looks bad but if he can come in and be McBob all of a sudden that deal doesn't look so bad. If we pick Boozer up, it won't be for the contract Chicago just amnestied. It'll be something much more reasonable leaving us with alot of breathing room.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After reading Clifford's comments on Vonleh, I'd be shocked if we don't put in a bid for Boozer.

Clifford was quoted as saying the following...

“If you’re going to take younger guys, you’ve got to give them time to grow and put them in situations where they can grow at the pace that works for them,”

“We have to have Noah’s best interest and progress in mind. At the same time, he’s affected by our results on the floor. We’re trying to win. It’s not fair to throw him out there night after night against starters. That’s also not fair to Al Jefferson, Kemba Walker, Gerald Henderson, etc. All the parts have to work together."

“I can make a really healthy argument that sometimes when guys are given too much (opportunity) they haven’t worked for, it very much hurts their development,”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After reading Clifford's comments on Vonleh, I'd be shocked if we don't put in a bid for Boozer.

Clifford was quoted as saying the following...

That quote sounds eerily reminiscent of Larry Browns rookie philosophy. That concerns me.

It also concerns me that we tanked for years to create the flexibility to sign Marvin Williams and Carlos Boozer and draft rookies that won't see the court. Gotta say, after all the momentum we built with the draft, this has been a worrisome offseason.

If they came out and said "We are waiting for the free agent class of _____" I'd be fine with what they're doing but it's that fear of the unknown with this teams plans that has some on pins and needles, especially if we don't land Lance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That quote sounds eerily reminiscent of Larry Browns rookie philosophy. That concerns me.

It also concerns me that we tanked for years to create the flexibility to sign Marvin Williams and Carlos Boozer and draft rookies that won't see the court. Gotta say, after all the momentum we built with the draft, this has been a worrisome offseason.

I've been saying for over a month now this guy doesn't like playing rookies.

Finally Bonnell actually wrote the quote down so I could post it here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The obsession you all have with what UNC fans think about Duke players is as ridiculous as your belief that UNC fans want every UNC player in the NBA on the Hornets.

Seek psychological help for your ABC'er delusions.

I didn't say all UNC fans just the ignorant ones who always have to dis the Duke players.

Why would you want to overpay for Marvin Williams but not under pay for Boozer? Makes no sense. I'm not going to say all UNC fans want UNC players on the hornets because I have talked to plenty of UNC fans that don't have their head up there ass. It does seem however there are still plenty that always has to dis the Duke, NC state, ect players for no reason and always have to be blinded about how good their UNC players are.

Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • be kind of hard with us going undefeated the rest of the year. yeah...i said it.
    • I don't think it's necessarily selfless to make that trade. I think it's all in how you plan and if you can objectively view the player. You know you're going to have a new coach and be taking a QB in the draft. Whether or not he wanted to admit it, we were going to be beginning a rebuild with a new offense and new defense. Depending on the coach, Burns may not have even been a good fit for the scheme that coach wanted to run.  So, if you're not 1st, you're going to need to trade up. Burns likely is going to want in the 30m per year range. While an effective pass rusher, he was never a complete DE. He wasn't a JJ, TJ, Bosa, or Garrett. He was more Reddick, and while good, never going to be in that top tier contract caliber.  So the question becomes, knowing that you need a QB to go with a new coach, is it better to have your  23, 24 and 25' 1sts  extra 24 and 25 1sts an extra 23'2nd  and 30m aav of future contract cap space to get a QB and edge rusher  Or your 23, 24 and 25 1sts and a good, but not elite DE on an elite tier contract.  6 picks and available 30m AAV in cap space vs 3 picks and 0 extra cap space to get a QB and a good, not great, DE.  To me that is a simple answer and frankly one that could potentially save my job. You have to have vision and be able to recognize value. Fitts over valued Burns like many fans did. I think ultimately what cost him his job was 3 years of not being able to value players correctly. We saw it twice in the draft in 2 separate years when he panicked and couldn't read the draft. DJ Johnson and Matt Corral picks specifically come to mind.  I don't think it was about being selfless as much as being a strategist. Neither Rhule nor Fitts never struck me as very strategic guys. I think they were more let's throw poo at the wall and see what sticks. Unfortunately for the fans, none of it stuck, but it still all stunk. 
    • The issue is the formula is secret, and it incorporates runs... So... Yup, it does. Same with PFF (which isn't quite as secret). But when it doesn't - like on Sunday - it's often to hilarious results. PFF is more reliable I think at matching my 'eye' test.
×
×
  • Create New...