Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hardy court thread : for all things that happen in court today


Jmac

Recommended Posts

She was admittedly on cocaine during the incident. Her story may have been credible enough for the judge, but now it goes before a jury. As far as the argument of Twitter and the truth.. I've sat on trials and served as a juror, I am no legal professional but Jones coverage of the trial was solid. pretty much all factual information. May not be "all that goes on" in the court room, but there is information there. Nobody knows the truth, possibly not even the people involved as they were all fuged up.

Yes his coverage was great.

And to Mr. Scot the future is now! Whether you want to accept it or not twitter can be factual and used as a real source of information. Depending on the person doing the twittering

Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If this had happened to your daughter or someone you cared about, you wouldn't encourage them to do anything within the law to punish the guy?

I have no idea if she's credible or not, but other than the goofy frivolous ones, the notion that a lawsuit hurts someone's credibility is a fallacy.

Domestic violence is one of the absolute nasties, and most difficult things to sort out, that any court ever sees. About 99% of the time it's all 'he said / she said' with maybe some medical reports thrown in. The man who are guilty of thos sort of thing are utter scum, and the women who use something like this for personal gain are equally slimy.

Who's who in this case? No idea, but I do know in a situation like this, a lawsuit doesn't make someone less credible anymore than a football uniform makes them more so.

None of us here knows what really happened. Most of the people claiming they do are just looking through their homer glasses.

If that was my daughter, the bruises would have been easily explainable. They'd be from me. Cocaine, weed with wings, "he ain't seen crazy yet", running from the cops when you're supposedly the victim....don't think it'd be a stretch to say she lacked proper disciplining growing up.

Edit for any morons that might have taken that literally:

In seriousness if that were my daughter, after hearing/reading everything that came out today, the only people I would be mad at would be my wife and myself for failing so miserably as parents. I would have a serious discussion with my daughter about turning her life around and do everything in my power to help her, definitely to include rehab and counseling. Even through the biased eyes of a parent, there's no way I could believe her story. The girl is dangerously unbalanced, dangerous to herself and obviously those around her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If this had happened to your daughter or someone you cared about, you wouldn't encourage them to do anything within the law to punish the guy?

 

I have no idea if she's credible or not, but other than the goofy frivolous ones, the notion that a lawsuit hurts someone's credibility is a fallacy.

 

Domestic violence is one of the absolute nasties, and most difficult things to sort out, that any court ever sees.  About 99% of the time it's all 'he said / she said' with maybe some medical reports thrown in.  The man who are guilty of thos sort of thing are utter scum, and the women who use something like this for personal gain are equally slimy.

 

Who's who in this case?  No idea, but I do know in a situation like this, a lawsuit doesn't make someone less credible anymore than a football uniform makes them more so.

 

None of us here knows what really happened.  Most of the people claiming they do are just looking through their homer glasses.

 

I know you're trying to be devil's advocate, but do you really believe Greg Hardy smacked this woman into a wall and picked her up and threw her? And all she had was some bruises on her chest and arms? And she fought him afterwards instead of getting the heck out of there the first chance she could? And called/text him multiple times after the incident?

 

Come on now, what do you really feel happened? I understand you couldn't really know, but what do you honestly think?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes his coverage was great.

And to Mr. Scot the future is now! Whether you want to accept it or not twitter can be factual and used as a real source of information. Depending on the person doing the twittering

Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

- It can be factual

- It can be used as a source of information

- It depends, however, on who is using it.

So, in short it's basically like words.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If that was my daughter, the bruises would have been easily explainable.  They'd be from me.  Cocaine, weed with wings, "he ain't seen crazy yet", running from the cops when you're supposedly the victim....don't think it'd be a stretch to say she lacked proper disciplining growing up.

 

 

Seriously. Not to mention dating serial jackasses who keep an arsenal laying around the house just 'cuz.

 

My daughter might "flail into the bathtub" too if you know what I mean.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's something we agree on. I think Hardy is a narcissist obsessed with money and "things". He's incredibly immature and reckless. Just don't think he's guilty of these two crimes.

 

He may not be.

 

He was found guilty though, which is pretty much the only thing that makes any difference in the real world.

 

Some guys never 'get it' until they face real world consequences.  Hardy's life is changed forever now, and he'll have to deal with it.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If that was my daughter, the bruises would have been easily explainable. They'd be from me. Cocaine, weed with wings, "he ain't seen crazy yet", running from the cops when you're supposedly the victim....don't think it'd be a stretch to say she lacked proper disciplining growing up.

Bet the skirt she was wearing was too short too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really? "REASONABLE" doubt. That definitely applies in this case. There are many cases where you there could be some 1 in 10 billion chance a guy is innocent and they find him to be guilty. That would be the right outcome. In this though there is absolutely a "REASONABLE" doubt that he ever laid a hand in her. Also, ever heard of DNA evidence? Just as important as video tape, if not more important.

 

CSI is a TV show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...