Hardy court thread : for all things that happen in court today

[LinvilleGorge]

Enough to convince a sitting judge.

 

I have no idea if Hardy's guilty, if the chick's crazy or what the real story is, but I'm not claiming to.  The only thing I feel totally comfortable saying is that Hardy needs to grow up and start using better judgment in what he does and whom he associates with.

 

That, and next year he plays somewhere else.

 

The bold I absolutely agree with.  "Enough to convince a sitting judge" carries virtually zero weight for me.  I don't have a whole lot of respect for our judicial system these days.  Too much activism, too little respect for the actual law.

[t96]

Can they suspend prior to the appeal and a jury trial? What if he is found innocent...could he not sue the NFL and the team for lost wages?

 

The NFL can suspend for whatever they fuging want. Even if he was found innocent today they could've still suspended him. 

[steveSmokin_D]

Sadly enough I saw it coming the second I saw the judge. He never had a chance even though everything points the other way.

 

[PantherWake]

Stop being old and annoying

Bruh...lol

[Navy_football]

You do not become a felon after being charged with misdemeanor assault.

 

Appreciate the correction. But he is a felon in the public's eye now. Unless he clears his name. 

[beastson]

Oh look

 

Black man vs white woman

 

Black man found guilty in the south

 

How surprising

[Sam Mills Fan]

Enough to convince a sitting judge.

 

I have no idea if Hardy's guilty, if the chick's crazy or what the real story is, but I'm not claiming to.  The only thing I feel totally comfortable saying is that Hardy needs to grow up and start using better judgment in what he does and whom he associates with.

 

That, and next year he plays somewhere else.

 

That's something we agree on. I think Hardy is a narcissist obsessed with money and "things". He's incredibly immature and reckless. Just don't think he's guilty of these two crimes.

[JawnyBlaze]

Seriously.  I was sitting here reading through this thread for info (I don't do twitter...) and throughout the whole thing I'm thinking "thank God, looks like Greg didn't do any of that poo and will be fine.  that bitch is insane." all the way up to the post announcing the verdict. 

[shelbypanther]

Two games max if any.  Media pinhead twats in Charlotte have nothing to report except for Queens Feast coming up, so they need the fodder.

 

I'd personally like to see them find the fuging asshole in Newton that killed the teacher in her apartment, but that doesn't sell.

[CarolinaPanthers8789]

Oh look

Black man vs white woman

Black man found guilty in the south

How surprising

Oh boy...

As JR always says,

Business is about to pick up.

[Delhommey]

You'd have to ask her. Maybe she's a feminist.

Hahahahahahahahahahahaha

Have your species discovered fire yet?

[Mr. Scot]

My point is this, she stated that it was never about the money. But was heard saying that she wanted him to pay her rent. Yes that was from a tweet, but it was given in sworn testimony. 

 

Immediately after the verdict, the first thing her lawyer says, is tat they are taking him to civil court. How does that not hurt her credibility?

 

If she had half a brain, she would not have made such a statement, nor would she start any civil proceedings until after the jury trial. Her lawyer would have to know he was going to appeal, and should have never made that statement. it makes her look like a gold digger, and I am sure will be brought up during the jury trial. At least it would if I were Hardy's lawyer.

 

If this had happened to your daughter or someone you cared about, you wouldn't encourage them to do anything within the law to punish the guy?

 

I have no idea if she's credible or not, but other than the goofy frivolous ones, the notion that a lawsuit hurts someone's credibility is a fallacy.

 

Domestic violence is one of the absolute nasties, and most difficult things to sort out, that any court ever sees.  About 99% of the time it's all 'he said / she said' with maybe some medical reports thrown in.  The man who are guilty of thos sort of thing are utter scum, and the women who use something like this for personal gain are equally slimy.

 

Who's who in this case?  No idea, but I do know in a situation like this, a lawsuit doesn't make someone less credible anymore than a football uniform makes them more so.

 

None of us here knows what really happened.  Most of the people claiming they do are just looking through their homer glasses.

[LinvilleGorge]

Hahahahahahahahahahahaha

Have your species discovered fire yet?

 

I'm glad you left out the rest of my post.  You're as fair as that judge.

 

I'll also have you know that my state (with my voting support) has legalized marijuana, is fighting for gay marriage rights, and many other progressive measures while my home state of North Carolina seems to be trying to displace Mississippi as the butt of all jokes when it comes to backwards politics so save your lectures for someone who may give a damn.

[t96]

If you took it to that extreme, you could never convict anybody that wasn't caught committing their crime on video tape.

 

 

Really? "REASONABLE" doubt. That definitely applies in this case. There are many cases where you there could be some 1 in 10 billion chance a guy is innocent and they find him to be guilty. That would be the right outcome. In this though there is absolutely a "REASONABLE" doubt that he ever laid a hand in her. Also, ever heard of DNA evidence? Just as important as video tape, if not more important.