Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam is the most overrated player in the NFL


Recommended Posts

:DNOT MY OPINION OF COURSE. :D

 

Written by a self proclaimed Saints fan.  I can't believe they allow idiots to post this garbage on their site.

 

Ironically 3 of them are/were NFC South QBs.

 

And CAM is #1.

 

http://network.yardbarker.com/nfl/article_external/the_10_most_overrated_players_in_the_nfl/16822648?linksrc=foxmiddle_nfl

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone that makes a list of overrated players and does not have Luck as #1,  can't be taken seriously.

 

 

Cam isn't considered an elite qb... he's not even considered a great qb by a lot of sports media.        Have to generally be rated extremely high in order to be overrated.

 

 

Luck is considered up there with Rodgers, Brees, Peyton and Brady,  by a lot of sports media. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not like the author's twitter handle is @SaintsNationBlg

 

Someone tell Roman Harper to stop following that trash.

 

Looking at this guy's other articles he finds anyway he can shoehorn Jimmy Graham or Drew Brees into the conversation. I really don't want to have these thoughts but I keep hearing those names so much I wish they would either retire or they get involved in some scandal that's so bad they're cut.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
    • I’m hoping SMU messes it all up and wins out. Imagine the SEC & BI0 would crap themselves trying to “fix” the problem.
×
×
  • Create New...