Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Interesting nugget right here......


bLACKpANTHER

Recommended Posts

Maybe something isn't popping up on my phone...

I'll just sit here quietly so I don't look more like a moron.

Sent from my iPhone

 

Note on CHA's Brian Roberts' deal -- it fits room exception, meaning CHA would wait to sign him to keep open as much space as possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe something isn't popping up on my phone...

I'll just sit here quietly so I don't look more like a moron.

Sent from my iPhone

 

can you see the tweet?

 

Brian Robert's contract is under a unique stipulation: "it fits room exception, meaning CHA would wait to sign him to keep open as much space as possible."

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe something isn't popping up on my phone...

I'll just sit here quietly so I don't look more like a moron.

Sent from my iPhone

I got you bro.

There's an exception in the Roberts contract that allows us to not sign until we are done signing elsewhere. Basically he's ours for free at the moment. Meaning we have right around.....15mil in open cap still. Before rookies but their numbers show about 2 mil for both so....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Note on CHA's Brian Roberts' deal -- it fits room exception, meaning CHA would wait to sign him to keep open as much space as possible.

Thanks... Definitely didn't pop up for me. That's freaking solid.

Hey you guys....back to Cho being a God again!!

Sent from my iPhone

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • be kind of hard with us going undefeated the rest of the year. yeah...i said it.
    • I don't think it's necessarily selfless to make that trade. I think it's all in how you plan and if you can objectively view the player. You know you're going to have a new coach and be taking a QB in the draft. Whether or not he wanted to admit it, we were going to be beginning a rebuild with a new offense and new defense. Depending on the coach, Burns may not have even been a good fit for the scheme that coach wanted to run.  So, if you're not 1st, you're going to need to trade up. Burns likely is going to want in the 30m per year range. While an effective pass rusher, he was never a complete DE. He wasn't a JJ, TJ, Bosa, or Garrett. He was more Reddick, and while good, never going to be in that top tier contract caliber.  So the question becomes, knowing that you need a QB to go with a new coach, is it better to have your  23, 24 and 25' 1sts  extra 24 and 25 1sts an extra 23'2nd  and 30m aav of future contract cap space to get a QB and edge rusher  Or your 23, 24 and 25 1sts and a good, but not elite DE on an elite tier contract.  6 picks and available 30m AAV in cap space vs 3 picks and 0 extra cap space to get a QB and a good, not great, DE.  To me that is a simple answer and frankly one that could potentially save my job. You have to have vision and be able to recognize value. Fitts over valued Burns like many fans did. I think ultimately what cost him his job was 3 years of not being able to value players correctly. We saw it twice in the draft in 2 separate years when he panicked and couldn't read the draft. DJ Johnson and Matt Corral picks specifically come to mind.  I don't think it was about being selfless as much as being a strategist. Neither Rhule nor Fitts never struck me as very strategic guys. I think they were more let's throw poo at the wall and see what sticks. Unfortunately for the fans, none of it stuck, but it still all stunk. 
    • The issue is the formula is secret, and it incorporates runs... So... Yup, it does. Same with PFF (which isn't quite as secret). But when it doesn't - like on Sunday - it's often to hilarious results. PFF is more reliable I think at matching my 'eye' test.
×
×
  • Create New...