Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Chandler Parsons is off the market

Chuckie

By Chuckie,
in Charlotte Hornets

Recommended Posts

Chuckie Newbie

Chuckie

Posted
Posted

Agreed to a 3 year 45 million dollar contract with the Mavs.  Rockets have 3 days to match.

 

What is more interesting is for the Rockets to be able to afford Bosh, Bosh has to be signed before matching the Parsons offer.

 

Bosh is in quite the prediciment.  One thing is for sure we will know if the big three will be broken up before Saturday.  I'm sure the Rockets are putting pressue on Bosh to make a decision now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ckad79 Newbie

ckad79

Posted
Posted

Well, now that Parsons is off the market, I worry about our ability to keep Gordon. I believe that the Jazz were interested in Parsons this offseason. Might have been why they were willing to let Gordon walk, assuming they had a shot at him.

 

I'm not sure how much money would have been enough for the Jazz to walk away on our contact to Gordon? People joke about Gordon's value at $16/m. Maybe $19/m? haha I mean, seriously. At $16/m and Persons still on the market, I say the Jazz wait it out and loose out on Gordon. Now, that they are a team with nothing better, desperation mode has set in. I'd be shocked if they let Gordon walk. They pretty much are forced to match any offer now.

 
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ItsPantone278 Newbie

ItsPantone278

Posted
Posted

Well, now that Parsons is off the market, I worry about our ability to keep Gordon. I believe that the Jazz were interested in Parsons this offseason. Might have been why they were willing to let Gordon walk, assuming they had a shot at him.

 

I'm not sure how much money would have been enough for the Jazz to walk away on our contact to Gordon? People joke about Gordon's value at $16/m. Maybe $19/m? haha I mean, seriously. At $16/m and Persons still on the market, I say the Jazz wait it out and loose out on Gordon. Now, that they are a team with nothing better, desperation mode has set in. I'd be shocked if they let Gordon walk. They pretty much are forced to match any offer now.

 

He's not eligible for more than 25% of cap.  A little more than 15.76 per avg

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOW!! Grand Master

WOW!!

Posted
Posted

Well, now that Parsons is off the market, I worry about our ability to keep Gordon. I believe that the Jazz were interested in Parsons this offseason. Might have been why they were willing to let Gordon walk, assuming they had a shot at him.

I'm not sure how much money would have been enough for the Jazz to walk away on our contact to Gordon? People joke about Gordon's value at $16/m. Maybe $19/m? haha I mean, seriously. At $16/m and Persons still on the market, I say the Jazz wait it out and loose out on Gordon. Now, that they are a team with nothing better, desperation mode has set in. I'd be shocked if they let Gordon walk. They pretty much are forced to match any offer now.

And if they do we are still a team with good cap space and a young talented corp ready for a playoff run again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TLGPanthersFan
      Slowing my roll on Ward (for now)

      By TLGPanthersFan · Posted

      Him and Sanders are the only QBs I would consider in the first round. I won’t be upset if we take Sanders, unlike some people on the board. Both have potential to be really good NFL QBs if the teams can develop them.  But as we have seen teams are not willing or are unable to now properly develop rookie QBs. 
    • Castavar
      Slowing my roll on Ward (for now)

      By Castavar · Posted

      I remember the last time we had a Cam at QB in Charlotte
    • Waldo
      CJ Stroud

      By Waldo · Posted

      Because Young is so historically bad that it just skews too far outside the normal deviations that perspective is easily lost. That or they just don't want to believe it.  The struggles last year would have been more about the infighting and poor roster building or idiot owner's hiring practices than with Stroud. He wouldn't have been as good but he wouldn't have been ruined here and the pressure was not Carr-esk if you take out the Young created portion from his playing style.  Dude is a young guy on a team coached by a Defensive guy building a good D but not building up the O in year 2 of his HC 1st time gig. Seems familiar... Go look at his output this year and not just some crappy Thursday night implosion game, I would take that in a second and never ever look back every time without a shred of doubt while eating 4 of those games a year with a giant smile on my face. 
×
×
  • Create New...