Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How did we lose this much money

Chuckie

By Chuckie,
in Charlotte Hornets

Recommended Posts

Chuckie Newbie

Chuckie

Posted
Posted

A story on the grantland.com website says the Hornets lost about $12 million last season, despite a $22 million revenue-sharing payment from the NBA.

Grantland writer Zach Lowe obtained a confidential NBA memo describing league-wide finances for the 2013-14 season. According to that story, the Hornets basketball operation ran at a $34 million loss, which was partially negated by the $22 million revenue-sharing payment – largest the NBA redirected under new rules attached to the collective-bargaining agreement.

Might need to temper my expectations on who we sign in free agency.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mj4life Newbie

mj4life

Posted
Posted

Since the NBA 's fiscal year just ended a couple days ago I doubt these numbers are for this year plus Forbes reported the Hornets making a 7 million profit last year. It has also been reported that the new revenue sharing & expected TV deal will make it possible for every team to brake even at minimum ( unless you go crazy like the nets)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rmoneyg35 Proficient

rmoneyg35

Posted
Posted

Since the NBA 's fiscal year just ended a couple days ago I doubt these numbers are for this year plus Forbes reported the Hornets making a 7 million profit last year. It has also been reported that the new revenue sharing & expected TV deal will make it possible for every team to brake even at minimum ( unless you go crazy like the nets)

The bobcats have always had these kinda problems I believe. Attendance is usually low and if you can't sell tickets you can't make money. I think changing into the hornets will help boost ticket sales and overall profit. The Bobcats are normally a bad team and it's hard to make money with a team that is consistently bad from year to year.

Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ckad79 Newbie

ckad79

Posted
Posted

It's hard to sell a bad product when the brand stinks. I know people will argue that the Bobcats were terrible, and winning is all that matters. Still, you could ask somebody who was born and raised in Little Italy and they would you that Pizza Hut pizza is garbage because it's a pile of deep frozen frozen mess.

 

Still, millions of people love it and think it's the BEST! Why? Because it's branded well. It's got a good name, good logo, good brand... folks identify with it and want it. A good brand can make up for a weak product. A weak product, can't save a bad brand though.

 

The Bobcats brand was complete poo. Let's be honest with ourselves. Nobody is saying that if we slap on a Hornets uniform and add Hugo, we'll start to win but from a branding perspective and needing a solid brand to find a following, it makes total sense. MJ would have been a fool to keep the Bobcats brand, when the Hornets brand was available. Even if a handful of fans out there, may still be upset that they are no longer called the 'cats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
thatlookseasy Newbie

thatlookseasy

Posted
Posted

Thought that only cost about 3.5 million.

 

Thats only the fee to the NBA to change the name, but I would assume there are a lot of other costs involved with the re-branding effort.  Designing new logos, jerseys, court, arena, producing new merchandise (while writing off all the old bobcat stuff), marketing the name change.

 

Plus you have a team with very little local support (coming off 2-3 very bad seasons), that just increased payroll significantly with the Jefferson signing and the Tyrus Thomas amnesty (that dude is still getting checks though he doesnt count towards our cap number).

 

Next season should see a lot of this investment pay off though, the team on the court should keep improving and capitalize on the local interest from the name change.  A winning team and interested fans means a lot more leverage for a better local TV deal

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Rocky Davis
      Chase Daniels breaks down Bryce vs DEN

      By Rocky Davis · Posted

      This was a good breakdown from Daniels.  Last year has had a lasting impact on Young. He still isn't getting the time needed from the OL - the OL we have is made to establish the run and for the run to be in play.  We get behind and have to throw all game we are doomed with this O-line. His receivers have to catch the ball when he makes a good throw to them, he can't have them dropping his good passes. Why are we running 4 slants all toward the same direction?  Why a triple option on 4th and 1? That's on the coaches. Bryce gets hurried and starts slinging the ball where it shouldn't be thrown, more study and recognition from him are needed.  Bryce doesn't step up in the pocket and throws too soon and unbalanced.  He over and under throws the ball because of it.  That's on him.  If the pocket isn't there and he can't get his base set he needs to check down or "live to fight another day." He has been thrown to the wolves and has lost his confidence.  This team doesn't have much, if any, talent and it's a cluster.  I think he can still be an NFL QB.  Maybe not a QB1 in the short term, but if he has a chance with better coaching and personnel he may be better than we are giving him credit for. I think we ruined him last year and have not fixed anything to help him this year.  If we can't run or get way behind all NFL defenses are coming after him.  Dalton has more respect and defenses didn't always sell out to get to him because he'd hit a quick slant, screen, or check down because he has the experience to know what's coming and what to do. Just my 2 cents.
    • Ghostofdelhomme
      Anthony Richardson benched

      By Ghostofdelhomme · Posted

      All depends on who the backup is. Josh Allen probably would have been benched too if there were better backups than Matt Barkley and Nate peterman.
    • tukafan21
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Where did I once say we should draft him because he's a projected Top 5 pick?   That's one of my many problems with you, your reading comprehension skills are very poor (and/or you just don't care to use your brain, one of the two).  I solely used that to point out that me pushing T-Mac isn't some absurd homerism, that at least I'm pushing someone who is deserving of a Top 5 draft pick. And despite me explaining it to you numerous times, you still seem to not grasp how QB's get placed in mock drafts vs draft grades.  They are treated entirely different in mock drafts to any other position, because of how teams generally treat them in the draft because of how important the position is. Literally any other position except QB, mock drafts generally follow draft grades with some team needs factored in.  But with QB's, draft grades are generally disregarded and they ALWAYS put a few QB's at the very top of the draft, because that's just usually what happens.  The exact same thing happened in 2022 with guys like Pickett and Willis widely being Top 10 picks in mock drafts, only for Pickett to fall to what, around 20?, and Willis going in the 2nd round (and even being the 3rd QB if I remember correctly too). The overwhelming majority of draft experts are saying there isn't a high first round grade on these QB's, but they still get mocked there because they're trying to predict how the draft will actually go. That's been my point the entire time, reaching for a QB in a bad QB draft when you have a roster as depleted of talent as ours, does not tend to work out well. And I've never said I'm not open to other players, I've very explicitly said that if a QB or DE stands out come draft time, I'm open to that discussion.  That I'd be open to Hunter as a CB but I prefer a WR over a CB at the top of the draft.  But we're also not talking about the 15th pick here where there could realistically be all sorts of possible picks to discuss.  With the first pick, there really would only be a small handful of options, T-Mac is head and shoulders above any other given our current roster and state of the franchise in general.
×
×
  • Create New...