Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

MKG's jumpshot is improving


SuperJTheGreat

Recommended Posts

One....I'm kidding cause I liked that joke.   Secondly MKG never has a defender in his face from outside.  They let him shoot.  He is a great finisher though....and I'm glad he working hard on his stroke.  He can only imiprove.  Will he ever be a good shooter....no.  I'd be happy with 38% from 17 ft.

 

As far as my ability.......I'd love you to put your money where you mouth is.

 

Hahah I literally laughed out loud, I never said anything about your ability bro.  I just think it's comical when people on an internet forum bring their own ability into the equation when discussing a bad shooter like MKG.  

 

And defending your ability from a perceived 'attack' is a little silly, don't ya think? Have a good day, YMCA star. 

 

O and I just made 37 three pointers in a row but my camera broke so I can't post it, maybe tomorrow. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hahah I literally laughed out loud, I never said anything about your ability bro.  I just think it's comical when people on an internet forum bring their own ability into the equation when discussing a bad shooter like MKG.  

 

And defending your ability from a perceived 'attack' is a little silly, don't ya think? Have a good day, YMCA star. 

 

O and I just made 37 three pointers in a row but my camera broke so I can't post it, maybe tomorrow. 

 

 

Lol.  That's good.  I'm glad you got your lulz.    

 

You know because I was so seriously comparing my game to MKG's by using the game of quarters as a reference.  

 

In reference to being a YMCA star....you goddamn right. At least I still play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Him and Sanders are the only QBs I would consider in the first round. I won’t be upset if we take Sanders, unlike some people on the board. Both have potential to be really good NFL QBs if the teams can develop them.  But as we have seen teams are not willing or are unable to now properly develop rookie QBs. 
    • I remember the last time we had a Cam at QB in Charlotte
    • Because Young is so historically bad that it just skews too far outside the normal deviations that perspective is easily lost. That or they just don't want to believe it.  The struggles last year would have been more about the infighting and poor roster building or idiot owner's hiring practices than with Stroud. He wouldn't have been as good but he wouldn't have been ruined here and the pressure was not Carr-esk if you take out the Young created portion from his playing style.  Dude is a young guy on a team coached by a Defensive guy building a good D but not building up the O in year 2 of his HC 1st time gig. Seems familiar... Go look at his output this year and not just some crappy Thursday night implosion game, I would take that in a second and never ever look back every time without a shred of doubt while eating 4 of those games a year with a giant smile on my face. 
×
×
  • Create New...