Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

We need to look for a STARTING PG.


SuperJTheGreat

Recommended Posts

I get it if people want to bring in another PG to help run things, but why Lowry?  Sure, he is better than Kemba right now, but he is 4 years older (and has gotten a lot better in the last 4 years I might add).  You cant play him next to Kemba without giving up a ton of size in the backcourt, so we would be spending a lot of money to replace Kemba and we still would need a 2nd ball-handler in the rotation.  Not to mention the problems Lowry has had with injuries in the past

 

If we could get a Dragic type player, who can run the offense well and has the size to play the 2 for stretches next to Kemba, I would be all over that.  I dont see that guy available at the moment though

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haha, as soon as someone throws out ACTUAL FACTS - you say they don't mean poo AND to try to prove them wrong you ask me to go get MORE STATS that will prove your point?? GTFO here

 

 

but i will oblige you:

 

Kemba  - .401 FG%.. .322 3pt%

Bledsoe - .445 FG%.. .327 3pt%

Lowry    - .418 FG%.. .350 3pt%

 

please stop trying to make it out like Kemba isn't a starting PG in the league.. just stop..

To add on to this stat: Kemba is the primary perimeter option on his team, while Lowry definitely isn't (DeRozan) and Bledsoe does it by committee when he isn't injured (Dragic, Green)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kemba is a bad team point guard. Takes too many shots. Isn't a strong distributor. Needs too much of the basketball to make his points. How many NBA teams have won anything with a PG like Kemba starting?

 

If your PG is taking more shots than anybody else on your team you either have a bad team or a bad PG. Just about any NBA quality starter taking the number of shots that Kemba took would have been good for 20 a night. His shooting percentage was well below average, but by all means we should look at his PPG numbers to determine his value to us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Him and Sanders are the only QBs I would consider in the first round. I won’t be upset if we take Sanders, unlike some people on the board. Both have potential to be really good NFL QBs if the teams can develop them.  But as we have seen teams are not willing or are unable to now properly develop rookie QBs. 
    • I remember the last time we had a Cam at QB in Charlotte
    • Because Young is so historically bad that it just skews too far outside the normal deviations that perspective is easily lost. That or they just don't want to believe it.  The struggles last year would have been more about the infighting and poor roster building or idiot owner's hiring practices than with Stroud. He wouldn't have been as good but he wouldn't have been ruined here and the pressure was not Carr-esk if you take out the Young created portion from his playing style.  Dude is a young guy on a team coached by a Defensive guy building a good D but not building up the O in year 2 of his HC 1st time gig. Seems familiar... Go look at his output this year and not just some crappy Thursday night implosion game, I would take that in a second and never ever look back every time without a shred of doubt while eating 4 of those games a year with a giant smile on my face. 
×
×
  • Create New...