Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rockets declined Chandler Parsons 4th-year option

Jakob

By Jakob,
in Charlotte Hornets

Recommended Posts

Tub of Goo Newbie

Tub of Goo

Posted
Posted

I'm not sold on bringing back or starting McRoberts but imagine the assists we would average a game between Kemba, Parsons and McBob. They would average 14 assists a trio.

 

Also imagine Big Al inside with Kemba, PJ, Jeff Taylor and Parsons on the outside.  Talk about space. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jakob Newbie

Jakob

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Also imagine Big Al inside with Kemba, PJ, Jeff Taylor and Parsons on the outside.  Talk about space. 

Barring an injury, Jefferson would probably average something like 25 points 13 rebounds with a team like that. People probably don't realize it but, Vonleh can knock down a three when left open. He didn't take many attempts last season but he was 16 on 33 attempts. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jakob Newbie

Jakob

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I'm pretty sure this will get done

Sent from my SCH-I545 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

MJ is a huge McRoberts fan so I bet he loves Parsons. I see us leading the pack to sign him unless another team overpays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jakob Newbie

Jakob

Posted
  • Author
Posted

4 years 40 Million? Last year is a player option.  

Considering he is averaging 16 Points, 5 Rebounds and 4 Assists and is clearly on the upswing of his career I don't think those numbers would be out of the question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Anybodyhome
      Canes vs Bruins 7pm Halloween Edition!

      By Anybodyhome · Posted

      As I said less than 10 minutes into the game, Boston looks nothing like we're used to seeing. Regardless, any curb-stomping of the Bruins is welcome.  The scorers all got the glory tonight, but all 6 D-men had excellent games. Across the board- Gost, Orlov, Chatty, Walker and, of course, Slavin & Burns.
    • Jackie Lee
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      I just tried a few mock draft simulators and this is the only way lol. Nothing else makes sense. 
    • tukafan21
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      No, biggest weakness is pass rush, but I don't think there is a blue chip can't miss DE prospect to take at #1 this year, same as with QB.  But beyond that, moving forward, yea WR is a pretty damn big weakness. We have 1 game this season over 224 yards passing and just traded away our best WR (who wasn't going to re-sign here anyways).  That WR no longer on the team was also the only player we've had this year who had over 78 yards receiving in a game.  So again, yea, WR is one of our biggest weaknesses even right now, let alone moving into the future. As I just said in my other post, I love Legette, but he's not going to be a Top 5-10 WR type of guy, Top 15-20 I can see, I think he can be a good #1 WR or an elite #2. After that, what do we have for the future?  Thielen isn't part of it, sure as hell isn't going to be Mingo, and as much as we all like Coker, in no world is Coker as our #2 to Legette as the #1 going be considered as "having weapons" at WR, even with Brooks and Sanders. But put someone like T-Mac into that group, who I genuinely think is going to be a Top 5 WR in this league for a long time, and it changes things.  A Top 5 WR with Legette/Coker as the 2/3, along with Brooks and Sanders, has the potential to be one of the best set of offensive weapons in the league if they reach their potential.  
×
×
  • Create New...