Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Worst Offense in the NFL


Mol3m4n

Recommended Posts

Jaguars: 

Cam Newton >>>>>>>>> Chad Henne

D-Will > Stewart = Gerhart 

Shorts > Cotchery/Benjamin

Olsen >>> Lewis

Jags O-line = Panthers O-line

 

Browns:

Cam Newton >>>>>>> Brian Hoyer

D-Will > Stewart > Tate 

Cotchery/KB >> Andrew Hawkins

Olsen = Cameron

Browns O-line >> Panthers O-line

 

Raiders:

Cam Newton >>>> Matt Schaub 

D-Will > MJD = Stewart > DMC

James Jones > Cotchery/KB 

Olsen >>>>> Ausberry

Raiders O-line = Panthers O-line

 

Jets:

Cam Newton >>>>> Geno Smith (Despite what Squirrel might say)

D-Will > Johnson = Stewart 

Decker > Cotchery/KB > Hill

Olsen > Cumberland 

Jets O-line >> Panthers O-line

 

Dolphins:

Cam Newton >>> Ryan Tannehill

D-Will > Stewart > Miller 

Wallace/Hartline > Cotchery/KB

Olsen > Clay (close though)

Panthers O-line >> Dolphins O-line

 

But yeah, whatever you want to say ESPN/BR/-entershitnetworkhere-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On paper we have the worse OL and WR corp. Our WR unit haven't played a season together yet, so no one knows what we have. Plus, all the guys we picked up were at best #3s for the team they came from.

 

Did you actually watch WR group from last year?

 

They were all awful, dropping critical passes, not getting separation or coming back to the ball on the regular. They had to go. 

 

This is what the national press doesn't know. Anything would have been an improvement. 

 

It's like when the national press says the "Carolina run game is their strength". That's the farthest thing from the truth, as the Carolina run games has been very inconsistent the past 2 seasons. Take Cam of the team, and they look quite pedestrian. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if some teams through owners that own other companies purchase more advertising get their teams talked about more on espn?

Sent from my XT1080 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Its Bleacher Report...not ESPN....or did I miss something?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...