Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Worst Offense in the NFL

Mol3m4n

By Mol3m4n,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Mol3m4n Mentor

Mol3m4n

Posted
Posted

I hate to make a thread about any bull that bleacher report comes up with. ESPECIALLY something that is the work of Matt Miller. However, I have to share what made me wake my household up at 2:00am from laughing so hard.

 

You all have more than likely already scanned over this.

 

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2091082-power-ranking-nfl-receiver-depth-charts

 

Without you having to go through the slides, I'll give you a spoiler alert. We're last. This is not what made me bust out laughing; it was this:

 

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2099809-power-ranking-nfl-offensive-line-depth-charts

 

I flipped to the first slide and just couldn't hold the laughter in. Not only are we ranked last for WR's but O-line too! I am looking forward to when the Panthers make the playoffs this year, and people are claiming that Cam is the greatest QB of all time. The truth is, our depth isn't that bad. Do we have all-stars in either position? Just one, and Ryan Kalil should bring our rating up single-handedly for being the best center in the league. Despite Kalil, we may not have tremendous starters, but we do have consistent wide receivers, endzone threats, hog molly/mauler guards, and "solid" tackle DEPTH. Not to even mention the amount of pure depth and upcoming talent on the back end of our receiver roster.

 

Rant over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RelaxImaPro Contributor

RelaxImaPro

Posted
Posted

I haven't scanned over it, and both those links are the exact same... so I still have no idea what you're laughing about.

 

I don't understand the dissent that we don't have the worst receiving corps and possible offensive line in the league, because all things equal... we more than likely do - on paper anyways.

 

It's not "hating" on the Panthers when someone mentions us as the dead last potential WR corps going into the season.  Seriously, name one worse.  Offensive line included.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jmac Grand Master

Jmac

Posted
Posted

Who the hell cares what these maroons say or think. They have to write something so they pull stuff out their ass and put it on the interwebs. Might as well ask the guy stocking the melons in Ingles for an opinion just as valid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Diehardpanther02 Newbie

Diehardpanther02

Posted
Posted

I stay on bleacher for this reason...made a name just to bash any and everyone who wants to bash the panthers with bias contradictory statements...the people on there have a sever hatred for cam(including the writers) and they never cease to amaze me with their ignorance...so since their soul objective is to bash the panthers and talk about how wonderful teams like Denver, NE, and SF are, my soul objective is to bash any and every doubter I see (fair weather panther fans included) and bring them down a level with real information...can't stand it dude they refuse to give credit to our squad and when they do it's usually to the front seven on d and that's becuz that can't be denies with 60 sacks registered...lol and they still think luke is overrated jus the way they feel about cam... But I will continue to back my team and as long as I'm alive I will continue to thrash their DA so called sports analyst who jerk off to stats and never seem to entertain that football is a team sport and sometimes your still great with sub par stats..

My

Rant

Is now

OVER !!effing bleacher report!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...