Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Stewart healthy & moving well. Rivera's Party Line a Red Herring.

top dawg

By top dawg,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
Posted

As we all know, Johnathan Stewart is healthy this year, and I guess we can take some comfort in the fact that Ron Rivera affirms as much in David Newton's article this morning.

 

"Very excited about having Jonathan on the field," coach Ron Rivera said after Wednesday's workout. "He's healthy again. He's moving the way we need him to move. I like what we're getting out of him.

 

 

 

One thing that Rivera has espoused basically since the beginning of the off-season is the success of our running game last year. 

 

"We need to be able to rush for 100 yards a game like we did last year," Rivera said. "That's one of the things that really helped us out [last season]. We ran the ball well, we controlled the clock, we controlled the tempo of the game." 

 

 

 

Now, David Newton correctly noted that a healthy Stewart (fingers crossed) will only help the run game, but unlike Rivera who really is loath to mention Cam Newton in reference to the root of the "success"  of the Panthers running game last year, David Newton at least threw in Cam ostensibly as kind of an afterthought.

 

The rotation of a healthy Stewart and Williams, along with fullback/halfback Mike Tolbert, could give the Panthers one of the best trio of running backs in the league. 

Throw in quarterback Cam Newton, who should be stronger and faster than ever once his left ankle completely heals from surgery, and Carolina has four legitimate threats in the running game. 

 

 

 

Let us all cross our fingers that a healthy Stewart's production can eclipse Cam's rushing numbers, because that will be an indication that our running game truly is efficient and fitting of a power rushing team.  If Stewart can truly improve the running game, then that will go a long way towards returning the whole offense to equilibrium. And we haven't seen anything near that in years.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
joemac Grand Master

joemac

Posted
Posted

Take away Cam's frantic scrambles and the run game is nonexistent last year.

But we have seen for the last 3 years that those are a part of Cams game and you can't take those away...that's what he does. I don't know why people are so anxious to have Cam stop running. He's extremely successful at it, and I hardly remember him taking any big hits when he's running the ball. In the pocket is where he takes most of his damage, I.E. the last Saints game 2 years ago, or the Miami game last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Peppers90 NC Community Regular

Peppers90 NC

Posted
Posted

But we have seen for the last 3 years that those are a part of Cams game and you can't take those away...that's what he does. I don't know why people are so anxious to have Cam stop running. He's extremely successful at it, and I hardly remember him taking any big hits when he's running the ball. In the pocket is where he takes most of his damage, I.E. the last Saints game 2 years ago, or the Miami game last year.

No one was suggesting that Cam stop running.  The point is that the run game was pretty bad last year with the exception of Cam's runs.  I would say Tolbert was able to finish a few games out at the end as well, but our 1-2 punch was less than adequate last season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
panthers55 Grand Master

panthers55

Posted
Posted

Yeah it was all Cam in the running game last year.   No one contributed at all but him.

 

What??  You say we rushed for 2026 and Cam accounted for 585 yards which is only a quarter of the yards we rushed for even with a diminished backfield with Stewart hurt..  You say we rushed for 14 TDs and Cam had less than half those.

 

You say that he wasn't the only quarterback who ran for over 500 yards while the team ran for less than 2500 total.  What?? Seattle did the same thing??  They must not have had a rushing game either.  What?  They won the superbowl with their lousy running game.............

 

nevermind 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Peppers90 NC Community Regular

Peppers90 NC

Posted
Posted

Yeah it was all Cam in the running game last year.   No one contributed at all but him.

 

What??  You say we rushed for 2026 and Cam accounted for 585 yards which is only a quarter of the yards we rushed for even with a diminished backfield with Stewart hurt..  You say we rushed for 14 TDs and Cam had less than half those.

 

You say that he wasn't the only quarterback who ran for over 500 yards while the team ran for less than 2500 total.  What?? Seattle did the same thing??  They must not have had a rushing game either.  What?  They won the superbowl with their lousy running game.............

 

nevermind 

Come on man, I know you watched the games.  How many times did we run on first down and gain less than two yards?  Too many.  Of course we have a few good rushing games that pushed the stats in a favorable direction but we can certainly increase the production by being more consistent.  Hopefully the addition of Turner and a healthy Amini will help that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jeremy Igo Newbie

Jeremy Igo

Posted
Posted

But we have seen for the last 3 years that those are a part of Cams game and you can't take those away...that's what he does. I don't know why people are so anxious to have Cam stop running. He's extremely successful at it, and I hardly remember him taking any big hits when he's running the ball. In the pocket is where he takes most of his damage, I.E. the last Saints game 2 years ago, or the Miami game last year.

 

I agree you can't take it away. But credit Cam, and not "the offense" and definitely not Shula.

 

Cam's legs are the only reason Shula was not coaching the absolute worst offense in the league. Cam elevated it to its 28th ranking all by himself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • plmokn
      service

      By plmokn · Posted

      https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/12642811-can-i-change-the-name-on-my-cruise-reservation-guest-service-24hr-short
    • SmokinwithWilly
      Morgan as GM so far

      By SmokinwithWilly · Posted

      I'm not a fan for a couple reasons. You have to nail your 1st 2 picks, especially when you're lacking as much talent across the board as we were and you traded away the number 1 overall pick. Barring injury, they need to be immediate 4 year starters, and on this team, that's a pretty low bar to hurdle. I also really hated the FA strategy building up to the draft, particularly the guards, and the draft strategy itself. A strategy that focused on building around a QB that was so terrible he had no business being on the field. It was clear to pretty much everyone, BY wasn't ready to be an NFL starter. We dumped everything to build around him in the hopes he would become what we drafted him to be. And while the end of the year started showing some promise, we still don't know going into year 3 if he's going to live up to the hype. Dumping all your resources to build around a single player (and hope for the best) isn't as important as building a complete team.  If there's any certainty in drafting, it's HQ interior linemen are found in rounds 2-3, and even 4 pretty regularly. Dumping a ton of FA cash into those 2 spots didn't make sense when we have so many holes. Draft guards, pay tackles. It's one of the staple principles of oline building.  XL was always a project. He didn't have years of consistent high end performance in college. His hands are bricks, he body catches a lot, and he looks more like a 4th round receiver than a 1st. Maybe he improves, maybe not. He looked extremely raw as a rookie and we can only hope he might develop by the time his rookie contract expires. I'm always a fan of drafting guys that actually have hands coming out of college. Who cares if you can get open, or fight for the ball, when you can't actually come down with it consistently.  Then we get to Brooks. Taking a RB with a torn ACL who may or may not see the field in 24/25 over Zach Frasier, who already looks the vet at a position we've been severely deficient at since pre-injury Ryan Kalil. Relying on Corbett, coming off injury, to move from guard to center is never ideal, and the injury bug bit yet again, and we were scrambling trying to find someone to lead our 200m offensive line. And the worst part, we traded up to do it giving up 2 5ths to take Brooks when we're lacking talent everywhere.  Wallace, meh. Sanders looked good before that neck injury. But now we're into day 3 where expectations aren't extremely high for making the roster, unless it's the Panthers, but you can find some position players and rotational players to start plugging the Swiss cheese roster.  I give him credit for getting Coker as an UDFA and the trade for Jackson, but if that's the highlight of your draft, there's some serious problems with your drafting.  If we had saved the FA money spent on the guards, drafted JPJ and Frazier, and still been in pretty close to the same spot, better off cash wise (or spent on other FAs) going into FA this year. Coker ended up playing better than XL in less time. Brooks is Eric Shelton 2.0 right now. And we used 5 picks in the 1st 2 rounds, if you count those included in the trades. That's too much given up for a team that won 2 games the year prior. JMO, but I think the whole offseason strategy last year was flawed from start to finish.  
    • frankw
      Morgan as GM so far

      By frankw · Posted

      Everything hinges on his ability to build through the draft so it's unknown until we see the upcoming draft class in action. That's all that will ultimately matter. We cannot afford anymore duds or projects especially in the early rounds.
×
×
  • Create New...