Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

As bad as the Jacksonville is.....


Recommended Posts

We are still 6 games behind them on regular season winsl.  11 on total wins and .010 on winning percentage.

 

Another 12-4 season and J'ville 6-10 would even us up.

 

We have a ways to go to get above .500 in the regular season (138-160) but I think we could possibly achieve that in the next 5 yrs if we play consist.  We have an outstanding core.

 

Can't wait for training camp.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While both teams have had some ups and downs it shows the parity in the league.

Curious to know how teams like New England, Pittsburg and San Francisco performed since we have been in the league. Just to lazy to look. We are on the upswing now so I am confident we will continue to improve with franchise players like Cam and Luke.

Sent from my SM-N900V using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Panthers and Jags have the exact same win/loss record for the regular season- 144/160. Post season they're 5-6 and we're 6-5. The Jags, along with Houston, are the only teams to have never played in a championship game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP
    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
×
×
  • Create New...