Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

worst idea i've ever had!

mrka1979

By mrka1979,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

jamman Newbie

jamman

Posted
Posted

I disagree. Usually I think whining after the fact is lame if it goes on this long. But this guy isn't some anonymous guy. He's putting himself out there and putting his money where his mouth is.

Okay, maybe. But the least he could do is to vent on a Seahawks board where he might find a sympathetic ear or two. At this point, having a Seahawks fan litter a Panther's board with this stuff is just noise.

The whining was expected early. It's jumped the shark already. Time to start thinking about next year instead of hanging onto the past.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrka1979 Newbie

mrka1979

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I was talking about the guy that bought the billboard space not the thread starter.

I think it would've been better had the guy of bought some billboard space in downtown Pittsburgh. That would have been classic.

thats what I thought, that idea wouldve been hilarious:beerchug:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrka1979 Newbie

mrka1979

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Okay, maybe. But the least he could do is to vent on a Seahawks board where he might find a sympathetic ear or two. At this point, having a Seahawks fan litter a Panther's board with this stuff is just noise.

The whining was expected early. It's jumped the shark already. Time to start thinking about next year instead of hanging onto the past.

Listen dipshit Its suppose to be funny not whinning and pantherfan was talking about the DJ........So try reading the thread through before just looking at a picture then posting.

This just shows any idiot with a computer can have internet access.:owned:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
nolatiger Newbie

nolatiger

Posted
Posted

i dont think they got screwed. if Bens TD counted at the end of the game for the win then i could see some people being pissed off, i wouldnt be because i am one who thinks the right call was made.

Aren't you one of the people who whined about the Dallas game for about a month?

The whining Seahawks fans were annoying at first, but now they are kind of pathetic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrka1979 Newbie

mrka1979

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Well, you have CERTAINLY proven that theory.

Ha.........comming from a guy that said no one was watching this years Superbowl.

SB had the highest television rankings for any show ever televised 2nd only to the last showing of MASH in 1982.

:owned:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...