Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

worst idea i've ever had!

mrka1979

By mrka1979,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Goat2SRT Newbie

Goat2SRT

Posted
Posted

i dont think they got screwed. if Bens TD counted at the end of the game for the win then i could see some people being pissed off, i wouldnt be because i am one who thinks the right call was made.

im with you kaka...

we seem to agree a lot....you doin anything friday night??

jk..:-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Huscarl Newbie

Huscarl

Posted
Posted

The head of refs, Pereira (SP?) was on "Total Access" last night and went through the following calls: the D-Jack non-td when his one foot hit the pylon, the Locklear holding call, the B Ro td, the D-Jack PI, and the Hass "block". For all of those, he showed footage indicating why the call was made. On the B Ro td, he indicated that no matter how it was called on the field it couldn't have been overturned with the replay evidence.The only call that was deemed incorrect by him was the Hass "block". He showed that the ref had seen Hass seeming to go low on #26 and make contact when in fact he did not contact #26 at all, and was tackling the intercepting player (Ike Taylor).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrka1979 Newbie

mrka1979

Posted
  • Author
Posted

The head of refs, Pereira (SP?) was on "Total Access" last night and went through the following calls: the D-Jack non-td when his one foot hit the pylon, the Locklear holding call, the B Ro td, the D-Jack PI, and the Hass "block". For all of those, he showed footage indicating why the call was made. On the B Ro td, he indicated that no matter how it was called on the field it couldn't have been overturned with the replay evidence.The only call that was deemed incorrect by him was the Hass "block". He showed that the ref had seen Hass seeming to go low on #26 and make contact when in fact he did not contact #26 at all, and was tackling the intercepting player (Ike Taylor).

fug pereira it took him almost two weeks to come up with some jive ass bullshit rule to back up the rulling on the field.

He did say that the ben TD couldve gone either way and he wouldve agreed no TD if it were ruled no TD.The same went for the holding call but he is was right on the pylon d-jack call.

I just wonder how many meetings he had with the cmmisioner before going on that show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Huscarl Newbie

Huscarl

Posted
Posted

f*ck pereira it took him almost two weeks to come up with some jive ass bullsh1t rule to back up the rulling on the field.

Considering he did admit that the Hass call was wrong, I would say his assessments were fair. I didn't know that the reason they ruled offensive PI with D-Jack was because Hass was outside the tackles and hadn't thrown the ball yet. According to that rule, the call was correct.

He did say that the ben TD couldve gone either way and he wouldve agreed no TD if it were ruled no TD..

Ummm..that's what I said above. lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Goat2SRT Newbie

Goat2SRT

Posted
Posted

alright MH...listen...i am as impartial as they come for this super bowl. i really did not care who won...

DJack pushed off....you can CLEARLY see the defender leave his feet because he got pushed...watch the tape...

Roethlisberger i thought was in the endzone. there was no evidence that would overturn the call on the field.

and yes, the worst call was the block on 'hass'...i didnt actually see that tho cause i was shitting at that moment...the game was so boring i didnt care...

there you go. i DID NOT care who won the game. now stop yer bitchen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrka1979 Newbie

mrka1979

Posted
  • Author
Posted

alright MH...listen...i am as impartial as they come for this super bowl. i really did not care who won...

DJack pushed off....you can CLEARLY see the defender leave his feet because he got pushed...watch the tape...

Roethlisberger i thought was in the endzone. there was no evidence that would overturn the call on the field.

and yes, the worst call was the block on 'hass'...i didnt actually see that tho cause i was sh1tting at that moment...the game was so boring i didnt care...

there you go. i DID NOT care who won the game. now stop yer bitchen.

Listen you tell your kids to stop..............

This is all in fun I really dont care about the calls at this point anymore.

I will continue to post threads with humor aimed at that SHOW we called a superbowl.

You can either join in the laughter and fun or just dont click on my threads.

nuff said

Link to comment
Share on other sites
geno471588 Newbie

geno471588

Posted
Posted

i thought yall got f*cked too, but crying about the sh1t for this long is beyond pu$$y.

I disagree. Usually I think whining after the fact is lame if it goes on this long. But this guy isn't some anonymous guy. He's putting himself out there and putting his money where his mouth is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...