Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Newton nearly the same as Rodgers when passing in 2014 (minus 2nd downs where he falters).


top dawg

Recommended Posts

Cover 32 is reporting that Cam Newton is strikingly similar to Aaron Rodgers passing the ball per Pro Football Focus with that one big exception: second downs. They noted that PFF uses its own metrics that try and leave out stats/plays that skew the numbers  (like screen passes for big yardage), but the writer believes that Panthers fans should be encouraged (notwithstanding how PFF rates Luke Kuechly).

 

 

Pro Football Focus uses a different grading system than QB rating to evaluate quarterbacks to try and really gauge how the quarterback himself is doing and not just how the offense as a whole is. This is to prevent quarterbacks from benefitting from throwing a two-yard screen pass that a running back takes 80 yards to the house. On the flip side, it helps quarterbacks from being punished when they throw accurate passes that are dropped by receivers. Using this system, they graded every quarterback by down.

-On first down, Cam Newton graded out as the 13th best quarterback in the NFL. Aaron Rodgers was 14th.

-On third down, Newton’s grade was the 11th best of all the quarterbacks. Rodgers’? 10th.

-On fourth down, Newton was the best quarterback in the NFL. Second best? Yep, Aaron Rodgers.

 

 

The article also notes that Cam is at his best on third and long (as opposed to short or medium).  **remember this is about passing***

 

It also notes that Cam is "significantly better under center than in Shotgun."

 

To me this is just more evidence that Cam has grown significantly, and this despite having suspect protection and weapons.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cover 32 is reporting that Cam Newton is strikingly similar to Aaron Rodgers passing the ball per Pro Football Focus with that one big exception: second downs. They noted that PFF uses its own metrics that try and leave out stats/plays that skew the numbers  (like screen passes for big yardage), but the writer believes that Panthers fans should be encouraged (notwithstanding how PFF rates Luke Kuechly).

 

 

 

The article also notes that Cam is at his best on third and long (as opposed to short or medium).  **remember this is about passing***

 

It also notes that Cam is "significantly better under center than in Shotgun."

 

To me this is just more evidence that Cam has grown significantly, and this despite having suspect protection and weapons.

 

FYI: Cam was always better better "under center"--even during his rookie season. This is why we all complained about Chud taking away the pro-sets in 2012. Cam was also great during the blitz his rookie season as well. 

 

Not sure I care about Aaron Rodgers so much in the fist two stats, as they were 10-13 other players in front of them to begin with (if you put much faith in those stats). 

 

Quite frankly, it's stuff we already heard or new before, except now he's linked with Aaron Rodgers. 

 

Nonetheless, thanks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FYI: Cam was always better better "under center"--even during his rookie season. This is why we all complained about Chud taking away the pro-sets in 2012. Cam was also great during the blitz his rookie season as well.

Not sure I care about Aaron Rodgers so much in the fist two stats, as they were 10-13 other players in front of them to begin with (if you put much faith in those stats).

Quite frankly, it's stuff we already heard or new before, except now he's linked with Aaron Rodgers.

Nonetheless, thanks.

We go to shotgun in obvious passing situations. In 2012 Chud was trying to remove that predictability by going into shotgun on earlier downs in order to make it more effective.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We go to shotgun in obvious passing situations. In 2012 Chud was trying to remove that predictability by going into shotgun on earlier downs in order to make it more effective.

 

Unfortunately, it made the Read Option more slow developing and subjected Cam to more unnecessary hits (whether he actually ran the ball or not), amongst other things 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone who watches football knows that Rodgers is on another level as a passer. No metrics will tell you that but if you watch both of them you see it. Take your homer glasses off, use metrics when they confirm your bias, bitch about them when they don't.I

 

Uh, I don't think anyone is arguing with the fact that Aaron Rodgers is the superior passer at this stage of his career. He's a 9 year veteran.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone who watches football knows that Rodgers is on another level as a passer. No metrics will tell you that but if you watch both of them you see it. Take your homer glasses off, use metrics when they confirm your bias, bitch about them when they don't.

 

Whatever. And I am not necessarily moved by stats and metrics one way or another, but Rodgers has benefited greatly from a more pass-happy philosophy, better receivers, a more complete receiving corps, and arguably better play calling.  

 

This statistical analysis is in regards to 2014.  I doubt Rodgers would have done any better with our guys last year. I doubt it seriously. 

 

Basically, the jury is still out.  After all the dust settles and the careers are compared, then we'll see a clearer picture.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

cam has always been better from under center than shotgun which is weird because he rarely did that at auburn

That's because our tackles suck so much, the DEs get to him quicker by bull rushing them whereas under center they have to go around the OT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's because our tackles suck so much, the DEs get to him quicker by bull rushing them whereas under center they have to go around the OT.

Possibly has something to do with it although I wouldn't say gross sucked and bell wasn't as bad as people make him out to be but I think cam thrives in pro sets in general.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would hesitate to compare Cam Newton to any other QB. He has a different body and skill set from anyone that has ever played the position... ever.

 

How many times do you see Rodgers running by Safeties and Corners? Or juking LBs and DEs to the ground? And then running over said LB on the goal line?

 

Cam is not as polished a passer as Rodgers and Brady, or maybe even Luck and Wilson. But who cares? None of them are as big, as strong, or possess his whodini-like ability to escape defenders. 

 

This is Cam's 4th season and he finally has a WR as big, strong and athletic as he is. Probably pretty difficult for someone of his stature to throw to smaller targets. Just logical. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/12642811-can-i-change-the-name-on-my-cruise-reservation-guest-service-24hr-short
    • I'm not a fan for a couple reasons. You have to nail your 1st 2 picks, especially when you're lacking as much talent across the board as we were and you traded away the number 1 overall pick. Barring injury, they need to be immediate 4 year starters, and on this team, that's a pretty low bar to hurdle. I also really hated the FA strategy building up to the draft, particularly the guards, and the draft strategy itself. A strategy that focused on building around a QB that was so terrible he had no business being on the field. It was clear to pretty much everyone, BY wasn't ready to be an NFL starter. We dumped everything to build around him in the hopes he would become what we drafted him to be. And while the end of the year started showing some promise, we still don't know going into year 3 if he's going to live up to the hype. Dumping all your resources to build around a single player (and hope for the best) isn't as important as building a complete team.  If there's any certainty in drafting, it's HQ interior linemen are found in rounds 2-3, and even 4 pretty regularly. Dumping a ton of FA cash into those 2 spots didn't make sense when we have so many holes. Draft guards, pay tackles. It's one of the staple principles of oline building.  XL was always a project. He didn't have years of consistent high end performance in college. His hands are bricks, he body catches a lot, and he looks more like a 4th round receiver than a 1st. Maybe he improves, maybe not. He looked extremely raw as a rookie and we can only hope he might develop by the time his rookie contract expires. I'm always a fan of drafting guys that actually have hands coming out of college. Who cares if you can get open, or fight for the ball, when you can't actually come down with it consistently.  Then we get to Brooks. Taking a RB with a torn ACL who may or may not see the field in 24/25 over Zach Frasier, who already looks the vet at a position we've been severely deficient at since pre-injury Ryan Kalil. Relying on Corbett, coming off injury, to move from guard to center is never ideal, and the injury bug bit yet again, and we were scrambling trying to find someone to lead our 200m offensive line. And the worst part, we traded up to do it giving up 2 5ths to take Brooks when we're lacking talent everywhere.  Wallace, meh. Sanders looked good before that neck injury. But now we're into day 3 where expectations aren't extremely high for making the roster, unless it's the Panthers, but you can find some position players and rotational players to start plugging the Swiss cheese roster.  I give him credit for getting Coker as an UDFA and the trade for Jackson, but if that's the highlight of your draft, there's some serious problems with your drafting.  If we had saved the FA money spent on the guards, drafted JPJ and Frazier, and still been in pretty close to the same spot, better off cash wise (or spent on other FAs) going into FA this year. Coker ended up playing better than XL in less time. Brooks is Eric Shelton 2.0 right now. And we used 5 picks in the 1st 2 rounds, if you count those included in the trades. That's too much given up for a team that won 2 games the year prior. JMO, but I think the whole offseason strategy last year was flawed from start to finish.  
    • Everything hinges on his ability to build through the draft so it's unknown until we see the upcoming draft class in action. That's all that will ultimately matter. We cannot afford anymore duds or projects especially in the early rounds.
×
×
  • Create New...