Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

OTA's....Godfrey limited....Kug not so much


Jmac

Recommended Posts

The way the thread is titled made it seem like Godfrey was limited, Kug, not so much, as in, playing. At least that's how I initially read it.

Disappointed this guy will never, ever see a professional football field with pads on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The way the thread is titled made it seem like Godfrey was limited, Kug, not so much, as in, playing. At least that's how I initially read it.

Disappointed this guy will never, ever see a professional football field with pads on.

 

Yeah same, title could be a little more clear. As for him never seeing the field, it's still only May. I really don't have any expectations at this point though, the disappointment happened last year when he couldn't get healthy. If he surprises us great, if not oh well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whenever this happens the term "He doesn't have a football body" gets thrown around. I feel like this might be the case where kug doesn't have a body for anything, let alone football.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I knew someone would reply with that. He was drafted 4 years ago with an expiring contract. The Seahawks have a very good scouting dept.

Dude, gtfo here with this crap. So what you are saying is, every year we need to find a stud starter in the 5th, 6th, and 7th rds? That would mean the entire league would have to miss on a prospect. These teams are pros at scouting! Not sitting at home watching YouTube vids and reading bleacher report like yourself. It's very rare! Don't even waste your time responding, cause I sure won't respond back after this one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I knew someone would reply with that. He was drafted 4 years ago with an expiring contract. The Seahawks have a very good scouting dept.

 

With that logic, Kam Chancellor doesn't count either because he was taken the same year as hardy just one round earlier in the 5th. Sherman was taken one year later so he counts? I don't understand where the cutoff point is.

 

Just a little advice, no one will take you seriously if you come up with arbitrary reasons to discredit someone's response simply because you don't want to be wrong about something. You are basically acting like the kid on the schoolyard who makes up rules in the middle of a game just so he can win. 

 

If you didn't want people to say Hardy, you should have added "other than Greg Hardy" to your original comment.

 

Back to the original point: the seahawks have gotten very lucky with their late round talent, A bunch of their other picks have turned into jack crap, and that's the early round guys. The late rounds are a crapshoot, nothing else. Just because they hit on a couple doesn't make them the end all to be all of scouting departments. If they keep doing it, then yeah, I'll concede that they are the best. But until they hit on 100% of their picks, I'll chalk it up to good fortune for late round guys. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...