Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Anyone bought presciption glasses from Walmart?


ladypanther

Recommended Posts

I want no line bifocals, antiglare, tansition lenses.  Can get them at Walmart for 1/2 of what I can get them for at Lenscrafters.  (Do not have vision insuance).  Would buy the frames somewhere else.

 

Anyone bought from Walmart?? How is the quality?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just got a pair of glasses for wearing around the house at Visionworks for $69.  I don't know how much you were wanting to spend but that's pretty cheap in my opinion.

 

I am willing to spend a lot more but always do not want to spend more than I have to.  Lens Crafters is about 600 -30% (for not having insurance) for the lenses that I want. Plus frames.

 

I will check out visionworks.  Thanks.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've gotten all of my vision needs satisfied at Wal-Mart since high school. I still have the frames I got my freshman year of college. Pretty nice frames. Sturdy (starting to bend and get a little loose. Need to get black rimmed glasses next time I go back for my eyes) and comfortable. I don't know if they do transitions, but I THINK they do. If they don't, Sears used to (I had to go there to get my transitions in middle school). Lenses are decent quality. My only gripe is if you don't clean them semi-regularly, they get gunked up kinda easy and are a little easy to scratch if you're one to drop your glasses much.


Can't say as much about lenses, really. I wear contacts pretty much all the time. My glasses are in case I run out of contacts or if I just feel like giving my eyes a rest one day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

done

 

TY, TY, TY, TY,

TY, TY, TY, TY,

TY, TY, TY, TY,

TY, TY, TY, TY,

TY, TY, TY, TY,

TY, TY, TY, TY,

TY, TY, TY, TY,

 

TY, TY, TY, TY,

TY, TY, TY, TY,

TY, TY, TY, TY,

TY, TY, TY, TY,

 

TY, TY, TY, TY,

TY, TY, TY, TY,

TY, TY, TY, TY,

TY, TY, TY, TY,

 

TY, TY, TY, TY,

TY, TY, TY, TY,

TY, TY, TY, TY,

TY, TY, TY, TY,

 

TY, TY, TY, TY,

TY, TY, TY, TY,

TY, TY, TY, TY,

TY, TY, TY, TY,

 

TY, TY, TY, TY,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I manufacture lenses for a living in wholesale lab. (Surface and edge) Been doing it for 40+ years.  I am on my wife's insurance and go to walmart for one pair a year. They give the best price,copay ect.  They are just fine if the price is best.  If you feel you will have problems, best there than online. You got the walmart in person thing. If you think on line will be ok, you will need what they call a PD.   Any optician can do this , including walmart, but some are stuborn about for obvious reasons. To get a PD, you will need a MiliMeter  ruler.  Get a friend to look you face to face , YOU look at their left eye have them look at your right eye and put the zero there, Then YOU look at their right eye and tell them to get the number under YOUR left eye.  Usually will be around 63 MM. There are lots of ways to get this but this works fine.  I've made probably a million pairs of eye glasses. I do make my own lenses when i am not due on Insurance. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
    • I’m hoping SMU messes it all up and wins out. Imagine the SEC & BI0 would crap themselves trying to “fix” the problem.
×
×
  • Create New...