Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Poll: 9th Pick


MedellinHeel

9th Pick  

91 members have voted

  1. 1. Who do you want Cha to draft at 9 and why?



Recommended Posts

Why should we sprint to the podium to draft an undersized tweener PF who is insanely raw offensively and not an elite defender & rebounder?

Lets not forget the fact we just drafted Zeller 4th overall. SMH

. You know nothing Jon snow

Sent from my iPad using CarolinaHuddle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

-I would love to get Stauskas and/or Hairston. We need scorers and they can shoot from anywhere in the gym.  

 

-I am no Kentucky fan but I like Young and especially Randle if they are there @ 9 also. 

 

-Harris seems like the safest pick to me.

 

-I havent seen McDermott, LaVine or Gordon play enough to really comment. 

 

-I know nothing about European players like Saric. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Question for those who DO NOT want Aaron Gordon

If we got a shooter or scorer at 24 like Hairston or Warren, and got a guy like Hayward in Free Agency, would you become content with Gordon's current lack of offensive skills? Or no?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Question for those who DO NOT want Aaron Gordon

If we got a shooter or scorer at 24 like Hairston or Warren, and got a guy like Hayward in Free Agency, would you become content with Gordon's current lack of offensive skills? Or no?

 

No, not only is he completely raw offensively , he is also

 

- undersized

- tweener

- not an elite shot blocker

- not an elite rebounder

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My opinion on Gordon is this, as long as we have Big Al, we need stretch 4. As a matter of fact we need stretch every position. We need to force teams to make a decision, double team Al, or give up an open look at a 3. You can get away maybe with one guy being shooting deficient, but only one. And that includes the 4 position.

I would love to see us be able to go with 4 guys outside the three point line and Al in iso. Or pick and roll with three elite shooters providing space for Kemba and the pick guy.

I would be behind McDermott 100% if he can play the 4. I don't think he can defend NBA 3s. So as a SF, I don't want him. As a stretch 4, I love him.

My main concern is who is McD going to guard, he is undersized to play PF and too slow to play SF. Offensively I am not worried about him. He is nothing like Morrison so I think that is a bad comparison.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the team should look at Saric with the 9th pick, He's a big, solid rebounder and decent size for a stretch 4 (6-11 223) and he can shoot the ball (35% 3pt shooter). 

 

Use Zeller as the backup 5 and backup 4, that way he would still get 15-20mins a game at either PF or C. 

 

 

Get Hayward in FA with a 4 year 48-52m deal. Also sign Livingston

 

 

 

the lineup would be

 

Kemba, Livingston

Hayward, Henderson

MKG, CDR

Saric, Zeller

Jefferson, Zeller, Biz

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we go PF, Saric is the only option in my opinion due to how he would fit in our offense.

I'm not saying I want him because I'm weary of his upside, but there is a rumor floating around that he has been promised a spot in the lottery (if he wasn't he was going to pull out).

My personal preference is to get a proven power forward in free agency to help groom Zeller. I'm not a fan of having a rookie and a sophomore as our power forward combination.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we go PF, Saric is the only option in my opinion due to how he would fit in our offense.

I'm not saying I want him because I'm weary of his upside, but there is a rumor floating around that he has been promised a spot in the lottery (if he wasn't he was going to pull out).

My personal preference is to get a proven power forward in free agency to help groom Zeller. I'm not a fan of having a rookie and a sophomore as our power forward combination.

Wouldn't surprise me if we were one the teams looking at him. He fits Cluffords offense really well. I also don't see the problem with Zeller and Saric playing the 4 with Jefferson playing and Ewing on the staff. Perfect environment for them.

However the 2 would have to be upgraded for it to work well IMO.

Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wouldn't surprise me if we were one the teams looking at him. He fits Cluffords offense really well. I also don't see the problem with Zeller and Saric playing the 4 with Jefferson playing and Ewing on the staff. Perfect environment for them.

However the 2 would have to be upgraded for it to work well IMO.

Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

Trying to groom one big is hard, trying to groom two, technically three with Biyombo is near impossible. There is a reason you don't see it happen very often. It's just a common fact that forwards and centers take a little bit longer to groom and we don't have that type of time with Jefferson possibly playing a max of 4 more seasons.

We decided to put our self in win-now mode, it's time to make our grave in it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Exactly. Exposes the whole defense. Dude thinks anyone can be Aaron Donald or something
    • While we're talking a fresh prospect that I happen to be a fan of, might as well get on a soapbox: Point 1 - He is not undersized by any means, his length is far above the mean His wingspan is in like the 85th percentile. An interesting note - his wingspan is 5 inches over Khalil Mack, 2 inches over Will Anderson's.  Only 1/2 inch away from the no-production yet size hyped 6'5 267 Shemar Stewart's. For comp - Ez's is around 83", arm length 34".  For NFL comp, the mean for wingspan is 80" and arms 33.5" at for starting EDGE defenders.  So it's not just my isolated comparisons. Point 2 - He isn't just a flashy "pass rush specialist" His film (and testing) shows elite quickness, hand work, and ability to play with the heads of OTs that normal prospects don't grasp. (see my prior post) Testing wise, one of the fastest 3-cones and short shuttles for an edge in years.  Fastest this year for both -- and those two drills are the ones teams look at for pass rushers, usually very indicative of success.  His quickness is off the charts. He's a guy that played well, showed well to those casually watching and those film-studying.  Then he goes out and tests well to back it up.  Apparently interviews super well.  So, I think it's all about his capacity/potential as a run defender.  That's really what it comes down to.  Can he be a 3-down guy or is he a specialist?  I see a 3-downer, his run defense is better than given credit for. A breakdown Ez vs. the NFL mean Arm Length: 34" vs. 33.5" (over) Wingspan: 83" vs. 80" (over) 3-Cone: 6.94 sec vs. 7.23 (WELL over, 95 percentile) Short Shuttle: 4.19 vs. 4.424 (over) Height: 6'2 1/2 vs. 6'3 (slight under) People look at the height a smidge under 6'3 and take that without considering the rest.   I think with Ez, it all comes down to what teams think his run defense upside is.  All it takes is one team - if they think he can become more that a passing down guy, then he could go high.  But if guys like Nik Bonitto and Haason Reddick can turn into these all-arounders, I don't see why this kid can't either who has higher pedigree and better measurables. Now, I prefer Graham, Walker inside, Will Johnson, Barron, and some others over him, but once we're in this tier outside of the top guys, I find the argument way more compelling for Ez over a Mykel Williams or Shemar Stewart.    
    • Well if we’re bringing this guy with character issues in for a visit why not consider Mike Green at 8!? 
×
×
  • Create New...