Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hardy 911 call


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

I didnt read all 200 posts, but I read some of you sounding relieved, as if the girl was the problem. While that could turn out to be true, Just because Hardy called 911 and told his side of the story to the dispatcher, do not think that is evidence of innocence. It sounds convincing and is good news from that perspective, but the judge saw the bruises and marks on her body. The judge felt that the female was the victim. The legal expert who felt that the girl had been assaulted will not be a petty detail that can easily be overlooked.

She was drunk and high, and both his friend and Hardy were defending themselves. When a guy grabs a girl to restrain her bruises result. Hell some times when me and my girl are playing around I cause bruises by accident.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The thing that irks me about the result from this is the judge ordered Hardy to go to AA meetings three times a week, as if he's already been deemed guilty of something.

Sent from my iPhone.

If she didn't his lawyer may have told him to go anyway. It is a way to proactively keep any punishment lower if this doesn't get dropped.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

She was drunk and high, and both his friend and Hardy were defending themselves. When a guy grabs a girl to restrain her bruises result. Hell some times when me and my girl are playing around I cause bruises by accident.

 

There is also another 911 call that has a female voice saying that she saw him beating her. I want to give Hardy the benefit of the doubt, but nobody knows what happened.  Sure, Hardy may have restrained her at one point, but he could have thrown her around at another point.   Question:  Was he retraining her around her neck?

 

If you are saying that she was drunk and high, then I would have to ask, "Where are you getting that information?"  Was Hardy drunk and/or high and what does that prove anyway?

 

I hope you are right, Snake.  I really do.  However, if you are not, I want the truth to be told and the real victim cleared and protected.

 

Edited by MHS831
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is also another 911 call that has a female voice saying that she saw him beating her. I want to give Hardy the benefit of the doubt, but nobody knows what happened.  Sure, Hardy may have restrained her at one point, but he could have thrown her around at another point. 

 

If you are saying that she was drunk and high, then I would have to ask, "Where are you getting that information?"  Was Hardy drunk and/or high and what does that prove anyway?

 

I hope you are right, Snake.  I really do.  However, if you are not, I want the truth to be told and the real victim cleared and protected.

 

 

I'm pretty sure it was reported that they were both intoxicated. I am not sure where that info came from exactly.

 

You can tell from the door mans call that he is fairly questioning of the drunk lady yelling over his phone call. She says one second she was in there and saw in and the next that she heard it from the hall or something to that affect.

Edited by csx
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure it was reported that they were both intoxicated. I am not sure where that info came from exactly.

 

Based on the 911 call, Hardy seemed a bit slurry in speech, but aware.  Funny how people assume that she is guilty because she was drunk/high but give GH, a known lunatic, credit for being sensible and proactive. They are basing that on Hardy's statement to the 911 dispatcher.   I do not buy it.  However, that is not enough to convict him on either.  If Snake is right, if it was just restraint, lets see where those bruises were.  I understand bruises above the elbow on the arms.  Maybe at the wrists.  But if they were around the throat, he has a unique way of dealing with angry women.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Based on the 911 call, Hardy seemed a bit slurry in speech, but aware.  Funny how people assume that she is guilty because she was drunk/high but give GH, a known lunatic, credit for being sensible and proactive. They are basing that on Hardy's statement to the 911 dispatcher.   I do not buy it.  However, that is not enough to convict him on either.  If Snake is right, if it was just restraint, lets see where those bruises were.  I understand bruises above the elbow on the arms.  Maybe at the wrists.  But if they were around the throat, he has a unique way of dealing with angry women.

 

We don't know anything about the true extent of the bruises. We know there was something and it was enough for there to be misdemeanor charges brought and an investigation should get to the bottom of it. 

 

i find it a little odd that she went to the courthouse during his appearance but did not actually appear in front of the judge. If she is terrified of him why be there? It's certainly a good image to show her in public with a sling and big dark sunglasses. Though she never said anything about having facial injuries.

 

Anything is possible but I am hoping our star player did not pummel a woman. The court will figure it out though.

Edited by csx
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We don't know anything about the true extent of the bruises. We know there was something and it was enough for there to be misdemeanor charges brought and an investigation should get to the bottom of it.

i find it a little odd that she went to the courthouse during his appearance but did not actually appear in front of the judge. If she is terrified of him why be there? It's certainly a good image to show her in public with a sling and big dark sunglasses. Though she never said anything about having facial injuries.

Anything is possible but I am hoping our star player did not pummel a woman. The court will figure it out though.

I question why weren't the bruises at the scene not good enough for a arrest at that point?

Why if he had thrown her on Loaded "weapons" was he allowed to go back in his house and not be arrested until 7 hours later??

We are talking about a drunk giant with loaded weapons right??

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We don't know anything about the true extent of the bruises. We know there was something and it was enough for there to be misdemeanor charges brought and an investigation should get to the bottom of it. 

 

i find it a little odd that she went to the courthouse during his appearance but did not actually appear in front of the judge. If she is terrified of him why be there? It's certainly a good image to show her in public with a sling and big dark sunglasses. Though she never said anything about having facial injuries.

 

Anything is possible but I am hoping our star player did not pummel a woman. The court will figure it out though.

 

We know that the judge, a female judge, determined the bruises to be disturbing and put Hardy in jail. 

 

I am not trying to convict our top DE, but that means little to me if he was hitting a female.  There is evidence that suggests Hardy was not as innocent as he appears on the 911 call. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We know that the judge, a female judge, determined the bruises to be disturbing and put Hardy in jail. 

 

I am not trying to convict our top DE, but that means little to me if he was hitting a female.  There is evidence that suggests Hardy was not as innocent as he appears on the 911 call. 

We don't know that the judge found them disturbing. We know she found the evidence to be worth filing the charges. That doesn't take much in domestic violence cases does it? She could have had a scratch and it would have likely led to charges.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We know that the judge, a female judge, determined the bruises to be disturbing and put Hardy in jail.

I am not trying to convict our top DE, but that means little to me if he was hitting a female. There is evidence that suggests Hardy was not as innocent as he appears on the 911 call.

But she saw Bruises 4 or 5 hours later. The police at the scene didn't seem to think the bruises were enough to arrest anybody. Plus she refused medical help at the scene.

Where did she go after the police showed up at 4:18 when the couple were separated?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We know that the judge, a female judge, determined the bruises to be disturbing and put Hardy in jail. 

 

I am not trying to convict our top DE, but that means little to me if he was hitting a female.  There is evidence that suggests Hardy was not as innocent as he appears on the 911 call. 

 

The judge didnt put Hardy in jail.  It is mandatory for Domestic abuse accused to stay in jail for 24 hours.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The judge didnt put Hardy in jail.  It is mandatory for Domestic abuse accused to stay in jail for 24 hours.

Exactly.

 

The magistrate/judge has no choice but to set a court date once the evidence is brought before the court by the arresting officers.  It is now the states job to prove Hardy is guilty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Watching Rams/Eagles. Celebrating the St Louis Rams team that won the SB (Warner, Holt, etc..) while playing in Los Angeles seems wrong.  If I were in Los Angeles, no way I would attend a Rams game.  Probably wouldn't attend a Chargers game either.  Becoming a fan of a team that likes to move around just seems like a waste of energy as a fan.  
    • The only responses I am getting after providing statistics to put opinions in perspective seem to be from people who get angry and attack stats and people whose opinions differ from their own.  Have people on the Huddle ever overreacted, exaggerated, been wrong about players before?  Sure they have, so an alternative opinion with statistical support should not cause you to attack me or my views.  I am sorry your public schools failed you.  But your reactions are very revealing--you are stuck in Piaget's concrete operational stage--learn logic, how to debate a topic, and learn the difference between facts and emotional opinions.  When I paralleled Cam's stats with Jones' to point out how remarkably similar their careers have been to this point, It blew some 40 watt minds.  I think Jones, in a better situation, could be good--that should not upset you--
    • penalties and poor hands is what cost us in the RZ Bryce missing "high" in the back of the end zone is not an issue, you're taught as a QB to throw high in the back of end zone were only the receiver can catch or no one The duo of Ian Thomas and Tommy tremble can both go at the end of the season, both been here for multiple seasons and they've barely developed
×
×
  • Create New...