Hardy 911 call

[MHS831]

The judge didnt put Hardy in jail.  It is mandatory for Domestic abuse accused to stay in jail for 24 hours.

The judge (according to local newscasts) called the injuries disturbing and expressed concern for her safety.  If Hardy called 911 and complained that she used her heel against him etc, why was she not also required to spend 24 hours in jail?

 

The biggest question I have, and this goes along with what WOW was saying, is "Why was the home not checked out by police?"  Surely the broken glass and the guns would have been red flags that would have necessitated an arrest.

 

However, many of you who are defending Hardy fail to take into consideration the female voice on the other 911 call, that claimed that she "seen" Hardy hitting her.  An eyewitness, bruises, etc. could look bad for him.

 

I am not convicting Hardy, but I am not going to defend a person accused of hitting a woman until I am sure he didn't do it.  Maybe some here don't find that to be upsetting, but if she were your sister or mother, I am sure you would feel a bit differently about it.

[csx]

Exactly.

 

The magistrate/judge has no choice but to set a court date once the evidence is brought before the court by the arresting officers.  It is now the states job to prove Hardy is guilty.

But the arresting officers didn't bring it to the court. He wasn't arrested.  She/her attorney brought it to the Magistrates Family Court alleging abuse. He wasn't arrested until the court deemed it worthy of bringing the charges. And then he turned himself in.

 

If he had been arrested on the spot then the DA would determine if charges would be filed.

Edited May 15, 2014 by csx

[Squirrel]

I wait for all the facts before I rush to judgment.  Not taking one side or the other.  The truth will get out sooner or later. 

[csx]

I wait for all the facts before I rush to judgment.  Not taking one side or the other.  The truth will get out sooner or later. 

 

Yep, I am done. It's intriguing but I'm going to remove myself from it and just wait to see how it unfolds. I hope she's crazy and he's not a monster.

[csx]

I wait for all the facts before I rush to judgment.  Not taking one side or the other.  The truth will get out sooner or later. 

 

Yep, I am done. It's intriguing but I'm going to remove myself from it and just wait to see how it unfolds. I hope she's crazy and he's not a monster.

[TheRed]

The judge (according to local newscasts) called the injuries disturbing and expressed concern for her safety.  If Hardy called 911 and complained that she used her heel against him etc, why was she not also required to spend 24 hours in jail?

 

The biggest question I have, and this goes along with what WOW was saying, is "Why was the home not checked out by police?"  Surely the broken glass and the guns would have been red flags that would have necessitated an arrest.

 

However, many of you who are defending Hardy fail to take into consideration the female voice on the other 911 call, that claimed that she "seen" Hardy hitting her.  An eyewitness, bruises, etc. could look bad for him.

 

I am not convicting Hardy, but I am not going to defend a person accused of hitting a woman until I am sure he didn't do it.  Maybe some here don't find that to be upsetting, but if she were your sister or mother, I am sure you would feel a bit differently about it.

 

Quit being so dramatic. Waiting for all the facts to come out before screaming for his head is not defending abuse on women.

[MHS831]

But she saw Bruises 4 or 5 hours later. The police at the scene didn't seem to think the bruises were enough to arrest anybody. Plus she refused medical help at the scene.

Where did she go after the police showed up at 4:18 when the couple were separated?

 

It sounds as if you are looking for slanted,  circumstantial reasons to support a person who might have just beaten a woman.  There is reason to question some things at the appropriate time, but these questions need to come from objective thinkers.  We all hope he is innocent, but I am not going to support him until I know for a fact what happened.  You are presenting one-sided, inferential, insignificant, fragmented details and seem convinced that you have turned the tables.

 

The police?  You have not questioned their handling of the situation. Why question her actions during and in the aftermath of the alleged assault when she was high and traumatized?  If the police offered her medical attention and she refused, why would they then determine her injuries to be insignificant in terms of assault evidence?  The injuries do not have to require medical attention to evidence abuse-according to NC law, that is only required as evidence in child abuse cases.  Hardy claims to have been hit with a heel that drew blood.  Was he offered medical assistance?   Finally, maybe she went to a friend/relative's house and they advised her what to do to protect herself?  There is no statute of limitations that invalidates an assault charge a few hours after it occurs.  Much will come out.  I am not blaming Hardy, the police, or the girl. 

 

I am simply not going to build a case for a man just because he plays for my favorite football team.  I hope this gets worked out, but for now, I am glad we are not into him for $39-50 million guaranteed.

 

 

Edited May 15, 2014 by MHS831

[TheRed]

Honestly I'm just going to go ahead and say it, I doubt some of these people here would be so quick to convict him if he were white.

[Montsta]

Wait so some of you are going to go on the presumption of guilt until innocence is proven?

I hope to god you are never on my jury.

[TheRed]

Same type of poo was in the recent thread about Colin Kaepernick. Bigots here already had him locked up.

[Squirrel]

Honestly I'm just going to go ahead and say it, I doubt some of these people here would be so quick to convict him if he were white.

 

Not really. We have our white trash. 

[MHS831]

Quit being so dramatic. Waiting for all the facts to come out before screaming for his head is not defending abuse on women.

Perhaps you should have the person who reads posts to you explain what it is I am saying.  Nobody screamed for anyone's head.  That is how you twist facts and run with them.  Responding to anything you post is a usually a waste of time. 

[TheRed]

Not really. We have our white trash. 

 

Read above post.

 

Big Ben has allegations nobody even remembers it now. Colin Kaepernick? Oh, we better lock him away now. Oh wait, he actually didn't do anything? Yeah, it's the same story with the huddle, and elsewhere. Hey I'm white, but I see right through this facade.

[TheRed]

Perhaps you should have the person who reads posts to you explain what it is I am saying.  Nobody screamed for anyone's head.  That is how you twist facts and run with them.  Responding to anything you post is a usually a waste of time. 

 

Get off your high horse. Wasn't it you in a Kaepernick thread who made a comment that he looked like a terrorist? Classy.

Edited May 15, 2014 by TheRed