Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hardy 911 call

Zod

By Zod,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted

The judge didnt put Hardy in jail.  It is mandatory for Domestic abuse accused to stay in jail for 24 hours.

The judge (according to local newscasts) called the injuries disturbing and expressed concern for her safety.  If Hardy called 911 and complained that she used her heel against him etc, why was she not also required to spend 24 hours in jail?

 

The biggest question I have, and this goes along with what WOW was saying, is "Why was the home not checked out by police?"  Surely the broken glass and the guns would have been red flags that would have necessitated an arrest.

 

However, many of you who are defending Hardy fail to take into consideration the female voice on the other 911 call, that claimed that she "seen" Hardy hitting her.  An eyewitness, bruises, etc. could look bad for him.

 

I am not convicting Hardy, but I am not going to defend a person accused of hitting a woman until I am sure he didn't do it.  Maybe some here don't find that to be upsetting, but if she were your sister or mother, I am sure you would feel a bit differently about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
csx Grand Master

csx

Posted
Posted (edited)

Exactly.

 

The magistrate/judge has no choice but to set a court date once the evidence is brought before the court by the arresting officers.  It is now the states job to prove Hardy is guilty.

But the arresting officers didn't bring it to the court. He wasn't arrested.  She/her attorney brought it to the Magistrates Family Court alleging abuse. He wasn't arrested until the court deemed it worthy of bringing the charges. And then he turned himself in.

 

If he had been arrested on the spot then the DA would determine if charges would be filed.

Edited by csx
Link to comment
Share on other sites
csx Grand Master

csx

Posted
Posted

I wait for all the facts before I rush to judgment.  Not taking one side or the other.  The truth will get out sooner or later. 

 

Yep, I am done. It's intriguing but I'm going to remove myself from it and just wait to see how it unfolds. I hope she's crazy and he's not a monster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
csx Grand Master

csx

Posted
Posted

I wait for all the facts before I rush to judgment.  Not taking one side or the other.  The truth will get out sooner or later. 

 

Yep, I am done. It's intriguing but I'm going to remove myself from it and just wait to see how it unfolds. I hope she's crazy and he's not a monster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheRed Newbie

TheRed

Posted
Posted

The judge (according to local newscasts) called the injuries disturbing and expressed concern for her safety.  If Hardy called 911 and complained that she used her heel against him etc, why was she not also required to spend 24 hours in jail?

 

The biggest question I have, and this goes along with what WOW was saying, is "Why was the home not checked out by police?"  Surely the broken glass and the guns would have been red flags that would have necessitated an arrest.

 

However, many of you who are defending Hardy fail to take into consideration the female voice on the other 911 call, that claimed that she "seen" Hardy hitting her.  An eyewitness, bruises, etc. could look bad for him.

 

I am not convicting Hardy, but I am not going to defend a person accused of hitting a woman until I am sure he didn't do it.  Maybe some here don't find that to be upsetting, but if she were your sister or mother, I am sure you would feel a bit differently about it.

 

Quit being so dramatic. Waiting for all the facts to come out before screaming for his head is not defending abuse on women.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted (edited)

But she saw Bruises 4 or 5 hours later. The police at the scene didn't seem to think the bruises were enough to arrest anybody. Plus she refused medical help at the scene.

Where did she go after the police showed up at 4:18 when the couple were separated?

 

It sounds as if you are looking for slanted,  circumstantial reasons to support a person who might have just beaten a woman.  There is reason to question some things at the appropriate time, but these questions need to come from objective thinkers.  We all hope he is innocent, but I am not going to support him until I know for a fact what happened.  You are presenting one-sided, inferential, insignificant, fragmented details and seem convinced that you have turned the tables.

 

The police?  You have not questioned their handling of the situation. Why question her actions during and in the aftermath of the alleged assault when she was high and traumatized?  If the police offered her medical attention and she refused, why would they then determine her injuries to be insignificant in terms of assault evidence?  The injuries do not have to require medical attention to evidence abuse-according to NC law, that is only required as evidence in child abuse cases.  Hardy claims to have been hit with a heel that drew blood.  Was he offered medical assistance?   Finally, maybe she went to a friend/relative's house and they advised her what to do to protect herself?  There is no statute of limitations that invalidates an assault charge a few hours after it occurs.  Much will come out.  I am not blaming Hardy, the police, or the girl. 

 

I am simply not going to build a case for a man just because he plays for my favorite football team.  I hope this gets worked out, but for now, I am glad we are not into him for $39-50 million guaranteed.

 

 

Edited by MHS831
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted

Quit being so dramatic. Waiting for all the facts to come out before screaming for his head is not defending abuse on women.

Perhaps you should have the person who reads posts to you explain what it is I am saying.  Nobody screamed for anyone's head.  That is how you twist facts and run with them.  Responding to anything you post is a usually a waste of time. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheRed Newbie

TheRed

Posted
Posted

Not really. We have our white trash. 

 

Read above post.

 

Big Ben has allegations nobody even remembers it now. Colin Kaepernick? Oh, we better lock him away now. Oh wait, he actually didn't do anything? Yeah, it's the same story with the huddle, and elsewhere. Hey I'm white, but I see right through this facade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheRed Newbie

TheRed

Posted
Posted (edited)

Perhaps you should have the person who reads posts to you explain what it is I am saying.  Nobody screamed for anyone's head.  That is how you twist facts and run with them.  Responding to anything you post is a usually a waste of time. 

 

Get off your high horse. Wasn't it you in a Kaepernick thread who made a comment that he looked like a terrorist? Classy.

Edited by TheRed
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Prowler2k18
      We looked like a competent NFL team PIE thread

      By Prowler2k18 · Posted

      We could easily pick apart yesterday’s game: dropped passes, blown coverages, bad tackling and red zone issues to name a few. But it was clear that this wasn’t the same team from earlier in the season. They fought back and hung with the champs until the end. That’s what I was excited to see and it gives me hope that we’re on the right track.
    • Pejorative Miscreant
      Bryce developing before our eyes

      By Pejorative Miscreant · Posted

      I think BY played well today and exceeded expectations. I will temper future expectations as he has to string together many games of consistent quality. One game doesn’t convince me that he is a franchise QB or even a guy you want to stick with for another season. One game doesn’t erase all the negative play and limitations from the past couple of years. I hope he balls out and continues to get better but for me the verdict is still out   That said, I think he gave the team and fans hope yesterday which is a lot more than what we had when we woke up Sunday morning. 
    • Ricky Prickles
      Bryce Young - Good and Bad, what say you?

      By Ricky Prickles · Posted

      He was vastly improved today and we need to see more of Bryce the rest of the season to continue evaluate him in order to decide what the heck to do with him at the end of the season. He must play at least like this and improve more from here the rest of the season in order for me to keep him. No more 123 yard passing games and want to see at least this output weekly from him. If this is Bruce improving slowly over time then Canales is even better with developing QB's than I thought he was but still too early to tell and we need to see him the rest of the way as he has at very least earned back the starting gig moving forward.
×
×
  • Create New...