Greg Hardy Arrested

[tiger7_88]

And also, if he really did that, why the hell would he call 911 on himself?

Maybe he's not very smart.

Or maybe he thought "If I'm the first one to call, I win!"

Whatever the case, I hope what has been alleged isn't true. If its even close to what has been described above, Hardy is fugged.

[jtnc]

He called 911 because she wouldn't leave his house.

[jamos14]

Where does his friend enter into all this? Maybe he caused some if the alleged injuries?

 

He apparently held her down while Hardy called 911.  Sounds like that could easily cause a welt on her back.

 

Also, if she wasn't being an aggressor, than why did she have to be held down?

 

I don't want to come off as condoning any abuse towards women but this story is very very fishy.

[Strawman]

Next two headlines in this story.

Panthers Greg Hardy being sued by ex-girlfriend who accused him of choking her.

Suit against Greg Hardy of the Panthers settled out of court for undisclosed sum.

Sent from my iPad using CarolinaHuddle

[coralreefer_1]

LOL at the idea that a man like Hardy couldnt have done this because "she would be dead"

 

Most of us are perfectly capable in beating the hell out of our wives, yet also capable of stroking her cheek gently if she cries, or..we;;..you know.

 

It's called "control". Seriously, its like some of you have never wrestled around with someone weaker than yourself.

 

I hope to god all of this mess isnt true, but lets put this stupid idea that it cant be true because he is capable of so much more damage = innocence to rest. Most women whom have been battered "could" have received ALOT worse if the man truly wanted to dish it out, and it doesnt take a beast of an athelete to do so.

[PanthersBigD]

Where does his friend enter into all this? Maybe he caused some if the alleged injuries?

 

I'm thinking the friend was a 'she' and that's what started all of this. Sounds like angry, drunk girlfriend found him with someone else and went off.

 

The fact that she's already lawyered up doesn't pass the smell test. I think she's trying to take him for a ride, Panther Greg style.

[BeasonBeastingBacks]

so did they find marks around her neck from the strangling? 

[jtnc]

LOL at the idea that a man like Hardy couldnt have done this because "she would be dead"

Most of us are perfectly capable in beating the hell out of our wives, yet also capable of stroking her cheek gently if she cries, or..we;;..you know.

It's called "control". Seriously, its like some of you have never wrestled around with someone weaker than yourself.

I hope to god all of this mess isnt true, but lets put this stupid idea that it cant be true because he is capable of so much more damage = innocence to rest. Most women whom have been battered "could" have received ALOT worse if the man truly wanted to dish it out, and it doesnt take a beast of an athelete to do so.

With the injuries her lawyer is claiming(exaggerating) he would have been charged with a felony.

[jamos14]

LOL at the idea that a man like Hardy couldnt have done this because "she would be dead"

 

Most of us are perfectly capable in beating the hell out of our wives, yet also capable of stroking her cheek gently if she cries, or..we;;..you know.

 

It's called "control". Seriously, its like some of you have never wrestled around with someone weaker than yourself.

 

I hope to god all of this mess isnt true, but lets put this stupid idea that it cant be true because he is capable of so much more damage = innocence to rest. Most women whom have been battered "could" have received ALOT worse if the man truly wanted to dish it out, and it doesnt take a beast of an athelete to do so.

 

 

Care to explain how you strangle somebody with 'control'?   Do you strangle just a little bit?

 

Can you also 'slam' someone with control?

 

What about throw?   

 

All of these actions are what the warrant stated.

[tiger7_88]

LOL at the idea that a man like Hardy couldnt have done this because "she would be dead"

Most of us are perfectly capable in beating the hell out of our wives, yet also capable of stroking her cheek gently if she cries, or..we;;..you know.

It's called "control". Seriously, its like some of you have never wrestled around with someone weaker than yourself.

I hope to god all of this mess isnt true, but lets put this stupid idea that it cant be true because he is capable of so much more damage = innocence to rest. Most women whom have been battered "could" have received ALOT worse if the man truly wanted to dish it out, and it doesnt take a beast of an athelete to do so.

Wait, you're behind with this post.

We have already entered the "bitch/golddigger is looking for a payday!" phase of the festivities.

Please do try to keep up.

[Jon Snow]

No you can't.

There must be contact meaning, spit, throw, push, pull, bump or hit. The victim does not decide whether the attacker gets arrested, the police must have physical evidence, witness or admission by the attacker.

So. Something happened that was physical contact. That could mean the victim was assaulted or merely bumped into by the attacker. The law does not distinguish at the time of the attack between the extend of the physical contact. That will be determined during the sentencing phase. Fact is, if you are arrested for domestic violence, almost 100% of the time some type of contact occurred and there is either evidence of this contact, witness or admission by the attacker.

I beg to differ on this. You can have your ass arrested if they go to the police and make accusations and show bruises that they got doing something else. Trust me I know this for a fact.

Sent from my Nexus 7 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

[WOW!!]

She refused help at the time the police arrived. When cops 1st saw her she had minor scratches. He didn't get arrested on the scene but turned himself in later after she filed a report. She goes to the emergency room after refusing services at the scene.

He also has a friend collaborating who actually held the girl down.

Does this sound fishy to anyone else?

[coralreefer_1]

Care to explain how you strangle somebody with 'control'?   Do you strangle just a little bit?

 

Can you also 'slam' someone with control?

 

What about throw?   

 

All of these actions are what the warrant stated.

 

Yes, I can explain it. I do it all the time in my humble juijitsu class. I can "choke" a guy slowly enough that he feels the pressure and decided to tap before he goes out (as opposed to ringing his neck with all my weakness 100% from the start. And guess what, if they didnt tap they would go out, and yet there would be no mark.

 

And yes, thowing someone down "passively" as in, you know...not bulldozing them with all of your brute force, either pushing them yet not full power, or other throwing them (as in a Judo style thow" yet controlling their fall to an extent/

[Cyclonus]

Yes, I can explain it. I do it all the time in my humble juijitsu class. I can "choke" a guy slowly enough that he feels the pressure and decided to tap before he goes out (as opposed to ringing his neck with all my weakness 100% from the start. And guess what, if they didnt tap they would go out, and yet there would be no mark.

 

And yes, thowing someone down "passively" as in, you know...not bulldozing them with all of your brute force, either pushing them yet not full power, or other throwing them (as in a Judo style thow" yet controlling their fall to an extent/

 

Sorry buddy.  Most of us don't take jujitsu and don't have much experience practicing control while beating a woman.